• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >FROM 'FREE TRADE' TO 'FAIR TRADE: ' TRADE LIBERALIZATION'S ENDORSEMENT AND SUBSEQUENT REJECTION BY THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS, 1934-1975.
【24h】

FROM 'FREE TRADE' TO 'FAIR TRADE: ' TRADE LIBERALIZATION'S ENDORSEMENT AND SUBSEQUENT REJECTION BY THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS, 1934-1975.

机译：从“自由贸易”到“公平贸易：” 1934-1975年，美国劳工联合会和工业组织联合会对贸易自由化的认可和随后的拒绝。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The AFL-CIO supported the Reciprocal Trade Agreements program, as a predominantly political issue, best left to the discretion of the Executive Council and officers. Affiliated unions' concern with import competition were addressed by legislative efforts for international fair labor standards and trade adjustment assistance which, unlike peril-point and escape clause provisions, would not disrupt trade liberalization.; Objections to trade liberalization, for its effects on employment, earnings, and collective bargaining strength, were discounted by the AFL-CIO as concerns of an underwhelming minority of American workers. The AFL-CIO's endorsement of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act was informed by this conviction, as were afterward its demands for effective implementation of the Act's adjustment assistance provision, when affiliated unions called it a total failure.; Disaffiliation of the United Autoworkers, in 1968, over AFL-CIO involvement in U.S. foreign policy removed the AFL-CIO's strongest proponent of further trade liberalization. Leadership of the Industrial Union Department fell to the United Steelworkers who, alarmed by import competition, joined with unions in textile, apparel, electrical machinery and other industries, to reject voluntary restraints on exports to the United States and to demand import quotas. Redefining trade liberalization from a predominantly political issue to an urgent social and economic concern, in 1971, the AFL-CIO proposed a Congressionally-appointed commission to fix import quotas, control foreign investment, and regulate technology transfer. The Burke-Hartke Foreign Trade and Investment Act set the AFL-CIO against further trade liberalization under the Trade Act of 1974.; Following Robert Hoxie, and John Commons to a lesser extent, this study emphasizes unions as social process, and explains the development of AFL-CIO views of trade liberalization as product and productive of a stratum of AFL-CIO officials' interpretations of its affiliated unions' members. Its results contradict simple reduction of ideas to self-evident interests, as the study shows that the movement by the AFL-CIO from supporting to opposing trade liberalization was accomplished by redefining it from a secondary political issue to a vital economic concern, i.e., of interests themselves.
机译：AFL-CIO支持互惠贸易协定计划，这是一个主要的政治问题，最好由执行理事会和官员自行决定。有关国际公平劳工标准和贸易调整援助的立法努力解决了隶属工会对进口竞争的关注，这与危险点和逃避条款的规定不同，不会破坏贸易自由化。 AFL-CIO反对对贸易自由化的反对意见，因为它对就业，收入和集体谈判实力产生了影响，因为担心的是美国绝大多数工人。 AFL-CIO认可1962年《贸易扩展法》是出于这一信念，后来又要求其有效执行该法的调整援助规定，而其下属工会称其为完全失败。 1968年，由于AFL-CIO参与美国外交政策而导致的联合汽车工人解散，这消除了AFL-CIO进一步贸易自由化的最有力支持者。工业联盟部的领导权落到了钢铁工人联合会（United Steelworkers）身上，他们对进口竞争感到震惊，并与纺织，服装，电机和其他行业的工会一起加入，拒绝自愿限制对美出口并要求进口配额。 1971年，AFL-CIO将贸易自由化从主要的政治问题重新定义为紧迫的社会和经济问题，并提议由国会任命的委员会来确定进口配额，控制外国投资和规范技术转让。 《伯克－哈特对外贸易和投资法》使AFL-CIO反对根据1974年《贸易法》进一步进行贸易自由化。该研究在较小程度上沿袭了罗伯特·霍希（Robert Hoxie）和约翰·Commons（John Commons），并强调了工会作为社会过程，并解释了AFL-CIO的贸易自由化观点的发展，这种观点是AFL-CIO官员对其下属工会的解释的产物和产物的成员。研究结果表明，AFL-CIO从支持转变为反对贸易自由化的过程是通过将其从次要政治问题重新定义为至关重要的经济问题，即，将其简单化为不言而喻的利益。自己感兴趣。

著录项

  • 作者

    DONOHUE, PETER.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Austin.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Austin.;
  • 学科 Economics Labor.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1986
  • 页码 407 p.
  • 总页数 407
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 劳动经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号