• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND EXPLANATION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTERPRISE BEHAVIOR (ISSUES, METHODOLOGY AND THE CASE OF THE INDIAN CEMENT INDUSTRY) (INDIA).
【24h】

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND EXPLANATION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ENTERPRISE BEHAVIOR (ISSUES, METHODOLOGY AND THE CASE OF THE INDIAN CEMENT INDUSTRY) (INDIA).

机译：公众和私人企业行为的比较绩效评估和解释（问题，方法论和印度水泥工业的案例）（印度）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study compares the relative performance of public and private enterprises in the Indian cement industry. It is an ideal industry for exploring this issue because the homogeniety of output and uniformity of production process across firms, make it easier to focus on the differences related to ownership. Further, large sample size enables us to use statistical methods to arrive at generalizable conclusions.; The sample includes eight private and six public enterprises from 76/77 to 81/82. It has two analytical blocks. The first, comparative performance evaluation, finds the popular perception--that the public enterprises in this industry are inefficient--to be inaccurate. In terms of the level of public profitability (or quasi-rents per unit of fixed operating assets), calculated from detailed plant level data, we find no significant difference between the two sectors. In fact, in terms of the trend, the public sector out-performs the private sector. However, analysis of the two constituents of the public sector--state and central enterprises--reveals significant differences. State enterprises show a lower level but a higher trend in public profitability.; The second, comparative performance explanation, decomposes performance into its subcomponents and finds that, in general, the efficiency of a particular input in public sector is inversely related to the degree the discretion available in its use. For instance, it finds no significant inter-sectoral difference in the efficiency of intermediate inputs, whose use is technologically constrained. On the other hand, the public sector has a disadvantage in labor and working capital expenses, where managerial discretion is greater. Also, we attempt to explain observed differences in terms of quantifiable factors, such as economies of scale and rate of power-trippings, and unquantifiable factors, such as the market structure and the role of performance monitoring.; It is usually presumed that public enterprises are inefficient because they lack flexibility and initiative and are difficult to monitor. However, this study concludes that they may have done well in this industry because the fixed coefficent technology and supply constrained markets do not require much flexibility and initiative. Also, relatively simple technology and homogeneous output have made it easier to monitor performance in this industry. In short, the alleged organizational costs associated with public enterprises is a function of the nature of the industry and other policies. This study attempts to uncover some of these functional relationships.
机译：本研究比较了印度水泥行业中公共和私营企业的相对绩效。这是探索此问题的理想行业，因为公司之间的产出同质性和生产过程的均一性使得更容易关注与所有权相关的差异。此外，大样本量使我们能够使用统计方法得出可概括的结论。样本包括从76/77到81/82的8家私营企业和6家公共企业。它有两个分析模块。首先，比较绩效评估发现普遍的看法-该行业的公共企业效率低下-是不准确的。从详细的工厂水平数据计算得出的公共盈利水平（或每单位固定经营资产准租金）上，我们发现这两个部门之间没有显着差异。实际上，就趋势而言，公共部门的表现优于私营部门。但是，对公共部门的两个组成部分-国有企业和中央企业-的分析显示出显着差异。国有企业的公共利润水平较低，但趋势较高。第二种是比较绩效的解释，将绩效分解为其子组成部分，并发现，一般而言，公共部门中特定投入的效率与使用中的酌处权程度成反比。例如，它发现中间投入的效率在部门间没有显着差异，中间投入的使用在技术上受到限制。另一方面，在管理自由裁量权较大的情况下，公共部门在劳动力和营运资金支出方面处于劣势。同样，我们试图从数量因素（如规模经济和跳闸率）以及数量因素（如市场结构和绩效监控的作用）方面解释观察到的差异。通常认为，公共企业效率低下，因为它们缺乏灵活性和主动性且难以监控。但是，这项研究得出的结论是，由于固定系数技术和供应受限的市场并不需要太多的灵活性和主动性，因此他们在该行业可能做得很好。同样，相对简单的技术和同质的输出使监控该行业的性能变得更加容易。简而言之，与公营企业有关的所谓组织成本是行业性质和其他政策的函数。这项研究试图发现其中一些功能关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    TRIVEDI, PRAJAPATI.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Economics Commerce-Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1985
  • 页码 575 p.
  • 总页数 575
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号