• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Expert recommendations for the future of due process in special education: A Delphi study
【24h】

Expert recommendations for the future of due process in special education: A Delphi study

机译：关于特殊教育正当程序的未来的专家建议：Delphi研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to identify recommendations that a Delphi panel of experts judged to be the most important for the future of due process in special education for avoiding due process hearings. The study also sought to determine and describe the degree of importance and feasibility for the recommendations.;Methodology. This study employed a Delphi technique through 3 iterative rounds. Twenty-one experts in 2 panels, practitioners and academics/policy advisors, completed a series of 3 questionnaires. A priority matrix was utilized to further analyze the importance and feasibility of the recommendations.;Findings. The experts identified 30 recommendations and reached a high level of consensus on the importance of 6 of the recommendations and on the feasibility of 5 of the recommendations. The top 2 priority recommendations for importance and feasibility were to include in the reauthorization requirements for staff training in IEP development and the use of respectful communication. The use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) strategies was also a recommendation identified as important and feasible.;Conclusions. The most important and feasible recommendations identified by the experts reflect the need to include preventative practices that focus on resolving conflict for the purpose of improving interpersonal relationships to avoid due process hearings. The experts' recommendations represent a significant shift from the current tenor of the law, which focuses on legal actions aligned with civil court practices to a focus on practices for resolving conflicts within a human relations perspective.;Recommendations for Inclusion in the Reauthorization of IDEA. Specific recommendations were identified. Keep due process hearings as the final stage but do not include in IDEA any additional, specific, legal procedures. Change the tenor of IDEA to focus on proactive, preventative conflict resolution practices within a human relations perspective from a tenor based in highly procedure-driven, civil law actions. Do so by including in IDEA mandatory requirements for staff trainings in the development of IEPs with assessment, goals, and services aligned that are student-centered, for evidence of best practices in respectful communication, such as active listening, and for the use of ADR activities. Mandate and provide federal funding for ADR activities. Set parameters for the use of public education dollars to pay attorneys involved in due process activities.
机译：目的。这项研究的目的是确定建议，由德尔福专家小组认为这些建议对于特殊教育中正当程序的未来最为重要，以避免正当程序听证会。该研究还试图确定和描述建议的重要性和可行性。该研究通过3次迭代使用了Delphi技术。 2个小组的21位专家，从业人员和学者/政策顾问完成了3份问卷的系列。利用优先级矩阵进一步分析了建议的重要性和可行性。专家们确定了30项建议，并就其中6项建议的重要性和5项建议的可行性达成了高度共识。对于重要性和可行性，最重要的两个优先建议是将对IEP开发和使用尊重的沟通方面的员工培训的重新授权要求包括在内。建议使用替代性争议解决（ADR）策略也是重要且可行的建议。结论。专家们确定的最重要，最可行的建议反映出，需要包括以解决冲突为重点的预防措施，以改善人际关系，以避免正当程序听证会。专家的建议是从现行法律原则的重要转变，该法律原则着重于与民事法院惯例相一致的法律行动，而侧重于在人际关系视角下解决冲突的惯例。建议纳入IDEA的重新授权中。确定了具体建议。将正当程序听证会作为最后阶段进行，但在IDEA中不包括任何其他特定的法律程序。更改IDEA的期限，从基于高度程序驱动的民法行为的期限中，在人际关系角度关注于主动的预防冲突解决做法。为此，在IDEA中将对员工培训的强制性要求纳入IEP的强制性要求中，以学生为中心的评估，目标和服务应保持一致，以获取尊重沟通的最佳实践的证据，例如积极倾听，以及使用ADR活动。授权并为ADR活动提供联邦资金。设置参数以使用公共教育资金来支付参与正当程序活动的律师的费用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Metheny, Patricia.;

  • 作者单位

    University of La Verne.;

  • 授予单位 University of La Verne.;
  • 学科 Special education.;Law.;Educational leadership.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 242 p.
  • 总页数 242
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 动物医学（兽医学）;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:51:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号