首页> 外文学位 >Visions of Africa: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the 'New York Times'' Coverage of Africa.
【24h】

Visions of Africa: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the 'New York Times'' Coverage of Africa.

机译:非洲的愿景:对《纽约时报》对非洲报道的批判性话语分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Previous studies of African news coverage tend to look at very specific events or spectacles. Looking to take a more holistic view of media coverage of Africa and understanding the prominent agenda setting role the New York Times plays in international reporting, this study evaluates the New York Times' coverage of Africa at four moments in history -- 1982, 1992, 2002, and 2012 -- to assess the types of stories covered, if and how this coverage changed over time, and the language used to convey prominent themes. This study looks to understand if the stereotypes born in the age of the Enlightenment, used to justify both colonialism and slavery, and naturalized over time hold true when looking at a more holistic sample of news coverage versus the spectacles previously studied. Through the lens of postcolonial theory and armed with the toolkit of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this study works to start to deconstruct the stories told about Africa in order to challenge problematic representations and begin to work through the implications of this imagining of Africa. To do this, the analysis is broken into two parts. The first is a high-level overview of the coverage included in the full sample of 2,187 articles, including general observations from each one-year analysis period. The second goes deeper, looking closely at the coverage that emerged as most prominent, showing a tale of two very different moments in history -- one, Apartheid in 1982 and 1992, and, two, the intertwined issues of Militant Islam and Terrorism in 2002 and 2012 culminating in a case study of the Benghazi coverage. This study shows that the news coverage of Africa is as nuanced as the stories being told, despite the fact that the reporting is often as challenging as the previous literature explains. It also illustrates the importance of evaluating news events in the larger context of the news landscape, with a firm understanding of the structure and institution of media. Without this context, without this grounding, it is easy to essentialize our analyses just as much as the coverage can essentialize Africa and African issues.
机译:以前对非洲新闻报道的研究倾向于关注非常具体的事件或奇观。为了更全面地了解非洲的媒体报道并了解《纽约时报》在国际报道中扮演的重要议程设定角色,本研究评估了《纽约时报》在历史上的四个时刻(1982年,1992年, 2002年和2012年-评估报道的类型,报道的内容是否以及如何随着时间而变化,以及用来传达突出主题的语言。这项研究旨在了解启蒙运动时代出生的,用来为殖民主义和奴隶制辩护并随着时间的流逝而定型的刻板印象,在与以前研究的眼镜相比更全面的新闻报道样本中,这些刻板印象是否成立。通过后殖民理论的视角并配备了批评性话语分析(CDA)工具,本研究旨在解构讲述非洲的故事,以挑战有问题的代表制,并开始通过对非洲的想象的影响来开展工作。为此,分析分为两个部分。首先是对2187篇文章的全部样本中涵盖的内容的高层次概述,包括对每个一年分析期的一般观察。第二个更深入,仔细观察最突出的报道,展示了历史上两个截然不同的时刻的故事-一个,1982年和1992年的种族隔离,以及两个,在2002年的激进伊斯兰教和恐怖主义交织在一起的问题和2012年最终以Benghazi报道为例。这项研究表明,非洲的新闻报道与所讲的故事一样微妙,尽管事实上报道的难度通常与以前的文献所解释的一样。它也说明了在更广泛的新闻环境中评估新闻事件的重要性,并且对媒体的结构和制度有深刻的了解。没有这种背景,没有这种基础,就很容易使我们的分析基本化,就像覆盖范围可以使非洲和非洲问题基本化一样。

著录项

  • 作者

    St. Clair, Denise.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Journalism.;Mass communication.;African studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 297 p.
  • 总页数 297
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号