• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Who will defy authority? Personality features and destructive obedience in the Milgram paradigm.
【24h】

Who will defy authority? Personality features and destructive obedience in the Milgram paradigm.

机译：谁将无视权威？米尔格拉姆范式中的人格特征和破坏性服从。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The present study examined the potential role of individual differences in personality in the likelihood of engaging in destructive obedience to authority within a modified version of the Stanley Milgram paradigm (Milgram, 1963, 1974). Personality features examined included the Big Five dimensions of agreeableness, openness, neuroticism, conscientiousness, and extraversion, and the dimensions of the Dark Triad, which consist of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism (Paulhus & Williams, 2002). Participants were 39 undergraduates enrolled in introductory psychology classes who participated in exchange for partial fulfillment of a research requirement. Data were collected in two phases. Phase 1 consisted of online completion of personality measures. Phase 2 consisted of an in-person laboratory session in which participants engaged in an ostensible learning task. Via a rigged drawing, participants were always assigned the role of "Teacher" and an actor posing as another participant was always assigned the role of "Learner." Participants were tasked with conducting a paired-associates learning test consisting of 15 trials with the Learner via a computer. Participants were also instructed to administer escalating electric shocks as punishment to the Learner for every incorrect response. Each time participants indicated reluctance to continue with the learning task the Experimenter would urge them to continue by issuing a series of four increasingly demanding prods. The session ended if the participant refused to continue after the Experimenter had issued all four prods on a single trial or if the participant continued to trial 15. In reality, no electric shocks were actually administered and all of the Learner's responses were prerecorded. Results of logistic regression analyses revealed no meaningful associations between obedience and personality features. Due to low variability in rates of obedience, two additional variables were computed, which reflected participants' reluctance to obey. The first variable reflected the number of prods from the Experimenter each participant required during their session and the second variable reflected the trial on which participants required the first prod. Regression analyses revealed that only the Big Five dimension of conscientiousness significantly associated with participants' reluctance to obey, such that individuals higher in conscientiousness were more reluctant to obey the Experimenter.
机译：本研究在斯坦利·米尔格拉姆范式的修改版本中（米尔格拉姆，1963年，1974年），研究了个性差异中的潜在角色在对权威的破坏性服从中的可能性。研究的人格特征包括：顺从性，开放性，神经质，尽责性和外向性的五个方面，以及包括自恋，精神病和马基雅维利主义的黑暗三合会（Paulhus＆Williams，2002）。参加者是39名入门心理学课程的本科生，他们参加了交换以部分满足研究要求。数据分两个阶段收集。第一阶段包括在线完成人格测度。第2阶段包括面对面的实验室会议，参与者在其中参加了表面上的学习任务。通过装配的图纸，参与者总是被分配为“老师”的角色，而扮演另一个参与者的演员总是被分配为“学习者”的角色。参与者的任务是通过计算机与学习者进行配对学习测试，包括15个试验。还指示参与者管理不断升级的电击，作为对学习者每项错误反应的惩罚。每次参与者表示不愿继续学习任务时，实验者都会敦促他们发布一系列四个需求越来越大的产品以继续学习。如果实验者在一次试验中发布了所有四个产品后，参与者拒绝继续进行实验，或者如果参与者继续进行实验15，则该会话结束。实际上，实际上未实施任何电击，并且预先记录了学习者的所有回答。 Logistic回归分析的结果表明，服从与人格特征之间没有有意义的关联。由于服从率的可变性低，因此计算了两个附加变量，这反映了参与者不愿服从。第一个变量反映了每个参与者在其会话期间所需的来自实验者的产品数量，第二个变量反映了参与者需要第一个产品的试验。回归分析显示，只有尽职调查的五大维度与参与者的不服从显着相关，因此，具有较高自信心的人更不愿服从实验者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Southard, Ashton Caroline.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Southern Mississippi.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Southern Mississippi.;
  • 学科 Psychology Personality.;Psychology Social.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 110 p.
  • 总页数 110
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号