• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Key performance indicators to measure design performance in construction.
【24h】

Key performance indicators to measure design performance in construction.

机译：衡量建筑设计性能的关键性能指标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The performance of the design activities for a construction project can have a significant impact on the overall performance and efficiency of the project. Design activities need to be monitored to measure performance of the design process. Performance indicators can be used in this process. The Indicators can: i) measure the degree of success of a project or organization; ii) predict, control and measure the performance of design processes; iii) benchmark performances of different projects within the same company or with other firms; iv) track and demonstrate long-term development and improvement, thereby decreasing design and construction cost and time and increasing the quality of the design product. In the context of Canada, specific construction performance indicators to assess construction project performance across project phases have yet to be formulated and documented. Therefore, there is a need to develop such indicators for the Canadian consulting engineering. From this perspective, the present research introduces practical framework and describes a model that measure the performance of the design activities for Canadian construction projects.;Built on the results of the survey and experts judgment, a Model for Design Performance Measurement (MDPM) is introduced. The MDPM uses the standard Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to assign weights to the scores of the selected indicators, to measure a project performance and to compare projects. The MDPM is tested for small scale heavy constructions. The developed design performance measurement model can 1) predict, track, and control future performance, 2) highlight area/s for future improvement, 3) enable companies to benchmark the performance of different projects from the same or different companies, and 4) document all design performance data.;The main objectives of this research are the following: i) to identify key indicators that affect the design performance of construction projects; ii) to develop a model for Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure the performance of design activities in the Canadian construction industry; and iii) to examine the possibility of their use in the construction industry. The methodology adopted for this research is based on review of the existing literature on design processes, review of the existing literature on design performance indicators, questionnaire surveys, interviews with practitioners, and case studies. The questionnaires along with the interviews with designers and managers from the Canadian consulting engineering are mainly conducted to explore and indentify indicators affecting the design performance. The case studies are used to validate and amend the use of these indicators in measuring project performance at the design stage. A web-based questionnaire aimed at design and construction firms was constructed. The significance and the quantification of design performance indicators are determined using a statistical package. The results from the questionnaire were used to develop a generic set of nine groups of design performance indicators for the Canadian consulting engineering. However, this research focuses on the heavy construction sector. The nine groups of indicators have been compared in pairs to identify their level of importance to each other. Experts from heavy construction participated in the pairwise comparisons task.
机译：建设项目的设计活动的绩效可能会对项目的整体绩效和效率产生重大影响。需要监视设计活动，以衡量设计过程的性能。绩效指标可用于此过程。这些指标可以：i）衡量项目或组织的成功程度； ii）预测，控制和衡量设计过程的性能； iii）同一公司内或与其他公司的不同项目的基准绩效； iv）跟踪并证明长期的开发和改进，从而减少了设计和建造的成本和时间，并提高了设计产品的质量。在加拿大范围内，尚未制定和记录用于评估项目各个阶段的建筑项目绩效的具体建筑绩效指标。因此，有必要为加拿大咨询工程开发此类指标。从这个角度出发，本研究介绍了实用的框架，并描述了一种衡量加拿大建筑项目设计活动绩效的模型。基于调查结果和专家判断，引入了设计绩效评估模型（MDPM） 。 MDPM使用标准的层次分析法（AHP）方法为所选指标的得分分配权重，以衡量项目绩效并比较项目。 MDPM已针对小型重型建筑进行了测试。开发的设计绩效评估模型可以1）预测，跟踪和控制未来绩效，2）突出显示未来改进的领域，3）使公司能够对来自同一公司或不同公司的不同项目的绩效进行基准测试，以及4）文档化所有设计性能数据。这项研究的主要目标如下：i）确定影响建设项目设计性能的关键指标； ii）开发关键绩效指标（KPI）模型，以衡量加拿大建筑业中设计活动的绩效； iii）研究其在建筑业中使用的可能性。本研究采用的方法是基于对设计过程的现有文献的回顾，对设计性能指标的现有文献的回顾，问卷调查，与从业人员的访谈以及案例研究。问卷调查表以及与加拿大咨询工程公司的设计师和经理的访谈主要是为了探索和确定影响设计性能的指标。案例研究用于验证和修改在设计阶段测量项目绩效时使用这些指标。构建了针对设计和建筑公司的基于网络的问卷。使用统计软件包确定设计性能指标的重要性和量化。调查表的结果用于为加拿大咨询工程开发一套通用的九组设计性能指标。但是，这项研究集中在重型建筑领域。已将成对的九组指标进行了比较，以确定它们彼此之间的重要程度。来自重型建筑的专家参加了成对比较任务。

著录项

  • 作者

    Budawara, Nasma.;

  • 作者单位

    Concordia University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Concordia University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 234 p.
  • 总页数 234
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号