首页> 外文学位 >American honeymoon: Free speech, pragmatism, and American performance in the late 20th century.
【24h】

American honeymoon: Free speech, pragmatism, and American performance in the late 20th century.

机译:美国度蜜月:言论自由,实用主义和20世纪后期的美国表现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation takes as its starting point the frequent invocation of First Amendment rights by artists, and how the question of free speech became the centerpiece of national identity during the latter part of 20th century. This notion of freedom of expression is a relatively modern idea---one that is connected to profound shifts in American politics and personhood. Those ideas came to a head during the "Culture Wars" in the 1980s and '90s. Those wars, and the ways they manifested themselves through performance, provide the historical backdrop for this dissertation.;The Constitutional right to free expression has become one of the defining aspects of the American identity during the 20th century---speech (in all of its manifestations) equals freedom (in all of its appearances). In this way, artists are articulating a major theme in the American experience. However, the idea of human rights is relatively new, and the idea that they apply to everyone is a particularly recent concept.;There has been a perception that freedom of speech is a natural right, and an indispensable aspect of what it is to be a free human being. This thinking became prevalent during the volatile political atmosphere of the culture wars, specifically in competing interpretations of Constitutional law.;This study not only explores the controversies surrounding certain cases, but also problematizes essentialist notions of free speech, demonstrating---through a pragmatic analysis of theories of personhood and American law---that free speech is far more situational and contingent, relying upon the cultural tides of the moment.;This dissertation makes the argument that way to answer essentialism of one side is not to respond with another series of overarching theories of another stripe. This is a pragmatic approach to law, politics, and culture, and a portion of this dissertation also investigates the founders of pragmatism (William James, Charles Sanders Peirce, John Dewey, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.) and how their ideas have influenced and continue to shape the American intellectual landscape.
机译:本文以艺术家频繁援用《第一修正案》权利为起点,以及言论自由问题如何成为20世纪后半叶民族认同的核心。言论自由的概念是一个相对较新的概念,与美国政治和人格的深刻变化有关。在1980年代和90年代的“文化大战”中,这些想法浮出水面。那些战争及其通过表演表现出来的方式为本文提供了历史背景。宪法中的言论自由权已成为20世纪美国身份的定义方面之一-言论(在所有它的表现形式)(在所有形式上)等于自由。通过这种方式,艺术家可以明确表达美国经验中的一个主要主题。然而,人权的概念相对较新,适用于所有人的思想是一个特别新的概念。;人们一直认为言论自由是一项自然权利,是言论自由不可或缺的方面。一个自由的人。这种思想在文化战争的动荡的政治气氛中盛行,特别是在宪法对立的竞争解释中;该研究不仅探讨了围绕某些案件的争议,而且还对言论自由的本质主义概念提出了质疑,并通过一种务实的方式进行了证明。人格和美国法律理论分析---言论自由更依赖于当下的文化潮流,是情境和偶然性的;本论文提出这样的论点,即回答一方本质主义的方法不是对另一方的回应另一个条纹的一系列总体理论。这是对法律,政治和文化的务实方法,本论文的一部分还研究了实用主义的创始人(威廉·詹姆斯,查尔斯·桑德斯·皮尔斯,约翰·杜威和小奥利弗·温德尔·霍尔姆斯)以及他们的思想如何受到影响并继续塑造美国的知识面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nunns, Stephen.;

  • 作者单位

    New York University.;

  • 授予单位 New York University.;
  • 学科 American Studies.;Law.;Theater.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 433 p.
  • 总页数 433
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号