• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A comparative study of educational decentralization in China and Korea, 1985--1995: Motives, actions, and results.
【24h】

A comparative study of educational decentralization in China and Korea, 1985--1995: Motives, actions, and results.

机译：1985--1995年中韩教育分权的比较研究：动机，行动和结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Theoretically, the benefits of decentralization include the enhancement of democratic participation and managerial efficiency, and the reduction of financial deficiencies. Empirically, however, there is little consistent evidence supporting this premise. The consequences of reform vary in accordance with country-specific conditions: they appear to be successful, mixed, or failed.;This study seeks to shed light on how the goals, strategies, and consequences of decentralization interact with each other. It focuses on educational governance reform in China and Korea, which have different historical, economic, and political backgrounds. Two main themes are identified in this work: how different problems were addressed by the same policy instrument, decentralization, and how the results differed depending upon environmental conditions.;This led to three areas of investigation: the motivating forces for the decentralization of education, the manners of actuation, and the consequences in China and Korea between 1985 and 1995. A comparative approach was used involving a mixture of longitudinal (vertical) and cross-sectional (horizontal) analyses, which had been proposed and developed subsequent to the work of Bereday, Hilker, and Noah.;These longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses identified several isomorphic and idiosyncratic aspects of the educational governance reforms in China and Korea. The major similarities found include: (1) the economic and political crises as motivating forces, (2) the establishment of legal infrastructures, and the utilization of the incremental and asymmetric vi approaches in the manner of reform actuation, and (3) some positive consequences of reform such as increased educational funds and local educational autonomy.;However, coupled with these similarities were three important differences: (1) the key objectives to be solved: the financial problem in China versus the political problem in Korea, (2) the major actuation strategies: restructuring fiscal authority by decentralization and diversification in China, versus rearranging political power for public education between the central and local governments in Korea, and (3) the main consequences of educational decentralization: improved fiscal efficiency in China, versus enhanced political autonomy in Korea. Both countries experienced some side-effects or limits of decentralization such as financial disparities in education among regions in China, and rhetorical decentralization and citizen apathy regarding local educational autonomy in its early stage in Korea.
机译：从理论上讲，权力下放的好处包括加强民主参与和管理效率，以及减少财务缺陷。但是，从经验上讲，几乎没有一致的证据支持这一前提。改革的后果根据国家的具体情况而有所不同：它们看起来是成功的，混合的还是失败的；该研究旨在阐明权力下放的目标，战略和后果如何相互影响。它侧重于具有不同历史，经济和政治背景的中国和韩国的教育治理改革。这项工作确定了两个主要主题：同一政策工具如何解决不同的问题，权力下放以及结果如何根据环境条件而有所不同。这导致了三个方面的研究：教育权力下放的动机， 1985年至1995年间在中国和韩国的致动方式及其后果。采用了一种比较方法，该方法涉及纵向（垂直）和横截面（水平）分析的混合，这些分析是在分析工作之后提出和发展的。这些纵向和横截面分析确定了中国和韩国教育治理改革的几个同构和特质方面。发现的主要相似之处包括：（1）作为动力的经济和政治危机；（2）建立法律基础设施；以渐进的方式和不对称的vi方式以改革的方式加以利用；（3）某些积极的方面改革的后果，例如增加教育经费和地方教育自主权。；然而，这些相似之处还包括三个重要区别：（1）要解决的主要目标：中国的金融问题与韩国的政治问题；（2）主要的激励策略：通过中国的权力下放和多元化来重组财政权力，而不是在韩国的中央政府和地方政府之间重新安排公共教育的政治权力；（3）教育分权的主要后果：提高中国的财政效率，而不是增强韩国的政治自治。两国经历了一些分权化的副作用或局限，例如中国各地区之间的教育财政差距，以及在韩国初期对地方教育自主性的言论性分权和公民冷漠。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chung, Yeon Han.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 230 p.
  • 总页数 230
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号