目的：研究分析Pfannenstiel式剖宫产术和Misgav-Ladach式剖宫产术的术后二次开腹手术盆腹腔和腹壁粘连情况。方法根据我院1996到2005年接收的125例再次剖宫产患者来进行研究分析，对他们使用Misgav-Ladach式剖宫产术和Pfannenstiel式剖宫产术后二次开腹的盆腹腔和腹壁粘连情况，将Misgav-Ladach式剖宫产术的患者作为A组，共有75例，Pfannenstiel式剖宫产术的患者作为B组，共有50例。结果①A组腹壁粘连几率是54%，B组腹壁粘连几率是14%。②A组盆腹腔粘连几率是24%，B组盆腹腔粘连几率是64%。A组有2类患者43%，3类患者27%，4类患者7%，B组有2类患者28%，3类8%，4类0。结论 Pfannenstiel式剖宫产术患者接受二次开腹手术比M-L式剖宫产术患者出现盆腹腔和腹部粘连的几率要低一些。%Objective Research and analysis of the Pfannenstiel type and Misgav-Ladach type cesarean section cesarean section postoperative two open operation in pelvic cavity and abdominal wal adhesions.Methods According to our hospital from 1996 to 2005 125 cases received repeated cesarean section patients to carry on the research analysis, to their use of Misgav-Ladach type of cesarean section and after Pfannenstiel cesarean section two open abdominal and pelvic and abdominal wal adhesions.ResultsA group of abdominal wal adhesion probability is 54%, the B group of abdominal wal adhesion probability is 14%. The A group of peritoneal adhesion probability is 24%, B group of peritoneal adhesion probability is 64%. A group has 2 patients 43%, 3 class 27% class 7% patients, 4 patients, group B with 2 patients with 3 class 28% class, 8% class, 4 0.Conclusion In patients with probability Pfannenstiel cesarean section abdominal operation patients received two times than M-L cesarean section abdominal and pelvic and abdominal adhesion appears to be lower.
展开▼
