首页> 中文期刊> 《中国卫生标准管理》 >分析治疗难治性妇产科大出血80例临床对比研究

分析治疗难治性妇产科大出血80例临床对比研究

         

摘要

Objective To study the clinical effect for the treatment of refractory obstetrics hemorrhage.Methods In November 2013 to December 2014 in our hospital during the period of treatment of 80 cases of intractable hemorrhage of maternal, and the average random distribution of 80 patients, among them 40 patients in observation group hemostatic, artery embolization Methods for 40 patients of control group take groovy iliac or within the uterine artery ligation method to stop the bleeding.Results In the observation group than the control group of 40 cases of intractable hemorrhage patients in 40 cases of patients with refractory bleeding after the operation effect is better, in the treatment of refractory maternal bleeding artery embolization effect is more effective.The difference is statisticaly significant (P < 0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of refractory obstetrics hemorrhage, catheter arterial chemoembolization with fast hemostasis, hemostatic time is short, less postoperative complications and less blood loss and other advantages, it also can keep maternal womb in the largest extent.%目的 研究治疗难治性妇产科大出血的临床效果.方法 选取在2013年11月~2014年12月在我院接受治疗的80例难治性大出血的产妇,并将这80例患者平均随机的分配,其中对观察组的40例患者进行采取动脉栓塞术的方法进行止血,对对照组的40例患者进行采取常规的髂内或者子宫动脉结扎术方法进行止血.结果 观察组中的40例难治性大出血的患者比对照组中40例的难治性大出血的患者在手术之后的效果更好,治疗难治性产妇大出血时动脉栓塞术治疗效果更加有效.二者比较差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05).结论 在治疗难治性妇产科大出血时,导管动脉栓塞术具有止血速度快、止血时间短、术后并发症少及出血量少等优势,同时它也能在最大程度上保留产妇的子宫.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号