目的 比较超声电导下经直肠靶向给药与口服给药治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎的效果.方法 选择2016年1月～2017年1月南京市浦口医院门诊和住院收治的80例慢性细菌性前列腺炎患者作为研究对象,按信封法分为两组,分别为超声电导经直肠靶向给药组(A组)与口服给药组(B组),每组各40例.两组患者均治疗21d.比较两组患者前列腺液白细胞(WBC)数量、慢性前列腺炎症状评分(NIH-CPSI),以及治疗后随访1个月总有效率.结果 治疗后A组总有效率、前列腺液WBC数、NIH-CPSI总积分均优于B组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 与口服药相比,超声电导经直肠靶向给药治疗慢性细菌性前列腺炎效果较好.%Objective To compare the effect of transreetal ultrasound conductance-guided administration drug with oral medication in treating chronic bacterial prostatitis.Methods 80 patients with chronic bacterial prostatitis in the outpa tient and hospitalization of the Nanjing Pukou Hosptial from January 2016 to January 2017 were selected and divided into two groups by envelope method.There were transrectal ultrasound conductance-guided administration drug group (group A) and oral administration group (group B),with 40 cases in each group.Both groups were treated with 21 days.The number of prostatic fluid leukocytes (WBC),the total integral of chronic prostatitis symptom (NIH-CPSI) and the total efficiency follow-up l month after treatment in the two groups were compared.Results The total efficiency,the number of prostatic fluid WBC and the total integral of NIH-CPSI in the group A were better than those in the group B,with statistically significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with oral medicine,the effect of transrectal ultrasound conductance-guided administration drug in treating chronic bacterial prostatitis is better.
展开▼
