目的：探究在围绝经期异常子宫出血病因的诊断方面阴道超声检查与宫腔镜检查的诊断价值。方法123例围绝经期异常子宫出血的患者进行阴道超声和宫腔镜检查,在宫腔镜检查同时进行活检,将阴道超声和宫腔镜检查结果与病理检查结果进行对比。结果阴道超声检查正常的确诊率为90.9%,阴道超声检查异常的确诊率为86.1%；宫腔镜检查正常的确诊率为96.0%,宫腔镜检查异常的确诊率为89.8%；两种检查方法确诊率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对于围绝经期的异常子宫出血,可先进行阴道超声检查,查看子宫内膜是否厚于10 mm,并查看子宫壁及宫腔外是否有病变,若存在病变,则可确诊,若检查不到,则进行进一步的宫腔镜检查,与此同时,也要对患者在宫腔镜下取标本做病理,进而达到确诊的目的。%Objective To explore the diagnostic value of vaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy for pathogenesis of perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding.Methods A total of 123 patients with perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding received vaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy, along with biopsy during hysteroscopy. Comparison was made on results between pathological examination, vaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy.Results The accuracy of vaginal ultrasonography was 90.9% for normal detection, and that was 86.1% for abnormal detection. Hysteroscopy had the accuracy for normal detection as 96.0%, and that for abnormal detection as 89.8%. There was no statistically significant difference of accuracy between the two detection methods (P>0.05).Conclusion Vaginal ultrasonography is preferred in perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding for 10 mm of endometrium thickness and lesions in uterus wall and out uterine cavity. Diagnosis can be made on the basis of lesion, while further hysteroscopy examination is necessary if there is no detected lesion. Meanwhile, hysteroscopic sampling for pathological examination is also needed for diagnosis.
展开▼
