• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 中文期刊> 《中国全科医学》 >我国四省市社区卫生服务机构基本医疗服务的相对效率评价

我国四省市社区卫生服务机构基本医疗服务的相对效率评价

页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

目的 评价我国四省市社区卫生服务机构基本医疗服务的相对效率.方法 于2013年采用多阶段抽样方法,在山东省、上海市、安徽省及陕西省抽取37家社区卫生服务机构,采用数据包络分析(DEA)法分析基本医疗服务的相对效率.以固定资产总额、总支出、工作人员数及业务用房面积为投入指标,以医疗总诊疗人次、年医疗业务收入为产出指标,6个指标数据均截止到2012年底.结果 四省市37家社区卫生服务机构中有45.9%(17/37)为DEA有效.技术效率和规模效率的有效比例排名依次为上海市、山东省、安徽省、陕西省.由卫生行政部门和其他公有制主体举办的社区卫生服务机构的非DEA有效比例超过私有制为主体的机构.从四省市总体来看,非DEA有效的社区卫生服务机构与DEA有效的机构相比,多投入了45.62%的固定资产、30.13%的年支出、42.47%的工作人员以及44.20%的业务用房面积.结论 社区卫生服务机构基本医疗服务的相对效率不高,东中部以及私有制主体举办的社区卫生服务机构的DEA有效比例相对高.从机构角度看,卫生投入不足与资源浪费现象并存,应优化社区卫生服务资源配置.%Objective To assess the relative efficiency of basic medical services delivery in the community health service institutions in four provinces(municipality) of China.Methods Data envelopment analysis(DEA) was employed to analyze the relative efficiency of basic medical services delivery in 37 community health service institutions selected from Shandong Province,Anhui Province,Shaanxi Province,and Shanghai Municipality of China using multistage sampling in 2013.We set the total amount of fixed assets,total expenditure,number of primary care providers,and building areas of hospitals as the input indicators,and total number of diagnoses and treatments,annual benefits of medical services delivery as the output indicators(the values of these 6 indicators used in this study all investigated as of the end of 2012).Results Totally 45.9%(17/37) of the selected community health service institutions had DEA efficient results.Shanghai had the largest proportion of community health service institutions with efficiency in both technology and scale,followed by Shandong,Anhui and Shaanxi.The percentage of community health service institutions with inefficient DEA results held by public health administrative departments and other public sectors was higher than that of those held by private institutions.In general,compared to community health service institutions that had DEA efficient results,the community health service institutions that had DEA inefficient results made use of extra 45.62% of fixed assets,spent extra 30.13% expenditure annually,used extra 42.47% of primary care providers,and 44.20% of house area for providing medical services.Conclusion The relative efficiency of basic medical services delivery in community health service institutions was not high in these 4 provinces(municipality).The community health service institutions in Shandong,Shanghai and Anhui,and those held by private institutions had better DEA efficient results.The problems of insufficient investment and resources waste coexisted,so the resources allocation of community health service institutions should be optimized.

著录项

  • 来源
    《中国全科医学》 |2017年第16期|1929-1932|共4页
  • 作者

    郭敏璐; 王伟; 徐玲; 张耀光; 张明吉; 严非;

  • 作者单位

    200032 上海市,复旦大学公共卫生学院,卫生部卫生技术评估重点实验室,国民健康社会风险预警协同创新中心;

    200032 上海市,复旦大学公共卫生学院,卫生部卫生技术评估重点实验室,国民健康社会风险预警协同创新中心;

    100044 北京市,国家卫生与计划生育委员会卫生统计信息中心;

    100044 北京市,国家卫生与计划生育委员会卫生统计信息中心;

    200032 上海市,复旦大学公共卫生学院,卫生部卫生技术评估重点实验室,国民健康社会风险预警协同创新中心;

    200025 上海市,上海交通大学公共卫生学院;

    200032 上海市,复旦大学公共卫生学院,卫生部卫生技术评估重点实验室,国民健康社会风险预警协同创新中心;

  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类 医疗卫生制度与机构;
  • 关键词

    社区卫生服务; 基本医疗服务; 服务效率; 数据包络分析;

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号