For the correct compare of electricity consumption of China with other countries to supply international experience for the adjustment of industrial structure of China, this paper compares and analyzes the electricity consumption caliber, connotation and classification of final electricity consumption of International Energy Agency (IEA) and National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC). The results show that the classification and connotation of electricity consumption by NBSC and IEA are different. The electricity consumption caliber of NBSC is bigger than that of IEA, so is industry electricity consumption ratio. During the year 2000 to 2012, the electricity consumption of China NBSC is 1.06~1.07 times of that of IEA. In 2012 the ratio of final industry electricity consumption of China NBSC is 3.4 percentage points higher than that of IEA; while the ratio of residential and commercial electricity consumption of China NBSC is 1.8 and 2.3 percentage points lower respectively than that of IEA. The suggestion that statistical caliber of electricity consumption of China and IEA should be distinguished correctly is put forward.%为准确开展我国与世界主要国家用电量及其行业构成的国际比较，从行业用电构成方面为我国产业结构调整提供国际经验借鉴，本文对我国国家统计局与国际能源署用电量统计口径、内涵和终端用电分类进行了对比分析。结果表明，双方在用电量指标的分类和内涵上均有所区别，国家统计局用电量口径大于国际能源署，工业用电比重偏大；2000年到2012年间，国家统计局统计的我国用电量和人均用电量数据约是国际能源署相应数据的1.06~1.07倍，国家统计局统计的2012年我国终端工业用电比重与国际能源署口径相比高3.4个百分点，而居民、商业服务业用电比重相比则分别低1.8和2.3个百分点。建议在开展中外用电量的国际比较时，准确区分中外用电量的统计口径，正确应用统计数据。
展开▼
