虽然不断出现的新型权利主张是自然权利、道德权利和习惯权利等多种权利形态的复合体，但基于法律与其他社会规范的密切相关性，不能简单依据法律条文就对其进行否定，而应以德沃金的权利理论为指导正视其他权利形态，并以社会转型为背景分析其产生的具体原因。新型权利主张的主体、内容、客体等构成要素之所以发生一系列历史变迁，根本原因在于社会的转型使民众向国家发出分配正义的社会诉求。对此，必须立基于社群主义的政治立场，采纳自由主义的法学元素，严守法定权利的本质属性，明确新型权利主张法定化的具体标准：真实性、准确性、重要性。%Although the growing new-type claim for right is a complex of many kinds of rights including natural right, moral right and customary right, etc., we should not deny it simply according to law, in view of its close relativity with laws and other social norms. Instead we should confront the other kind of rights under the guidance of Dworkin’s right theory and analyze the specific reason against the background of the transformation of society. The basic reason of a number of historical changes in the subjects, the substance and the objects of the new-type claim for right is that people appeal for distributive justice to state due to the transformation of society. Therefore, we should base on communitarianism, adopt the element of liberalism and comply strictly with the essential attribute of the legal right in order to determine the specific standards of the legalization of the new-type claim for right, i.e. which are reality, precision and importance.
展开▼
