国史分期问题一直是学界比较关注的话题。研究者对国史分期也是言人人殊，至今未成定论。但很少学者对国史分期的标准问题加以思考。这是导致分期标准不一样的原因所在。国史分期标准的选择关系到分期的不同。可以把社会主义初级阶段、马克思主义中国化进程、中国特色社会主义发展道路、中国社会主义现代化建设等作为分期的标准。但学界比较倾向把探索中国特色社会主义道路作为标准划分国史。国史分期还要处理好党史分期与国史分期的关系、国史前后三十年的关系、中共领袖在分期时的作用、人代会和党代会在分期中的地位，等等。%The problem of dividing national history into different periods has been a concerned issue in aca‐demia .Although it keeps controversial ,few researchers think about the division criteria ,which leads to multifarious division .The choice of national history stages criteria related to different periods .It may set criteria with the primary stage of socialism ,the sinicization process of Marxism ,and China’s moderniza‐tion construction .The academia ,however ,tends to take exploring the socialist road with Chinese charac‐teristics as a division standard .The criterion needs to deal well with the relation between CPC history peri‐ods and national history periods ,different roles of NPC and Party Congress as well as effects of CPC lead‐ers of dividing periods .
展开▼
