首页> 中文期刊> 《中国医学创新》 >传统细菌培养法与荧光PCR法分离公共场所嗜肺军团菌结果比较

传统细菌培养法与荧光PCR法分离公共场所嗜肺军团菌结果比较

         

摘要

目的:对公共场所环境样本(水、土壤、气溶胶)进行嗜肺军团菌监测,掌握南京市公共场所中军团菌的污染情况和菌型分布。方法:对12家商场、医院中央空调系统采集水样(冷却水、景观水、淋浴水、自来水),土壤类样品(背景土、花卉土、风管积尘、景观土),采用传统细菌培养法及荧光PCR法进行嗜肺军团菌的分离鉴定。结果:12家单位共采样234份(水样88份、土壤146份),传统细菌培养法检出嗜肺军团菌9份(主要类型为Lp1型),检出率为3.85%;而实时荧光PCR法检出47份阳性(主要类型为Lp1型),检出率为20.08%。两者检出阳性率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:南京市公共场所存在嗜肺军团菌污染,荧光PCR法总检出率明显高于传统细菌培养法,荧光PCR方法较培养法灵敏性较好。%Objective:To monitor the Legionella pneumophila of public environmental samples(water,soil, aerosol),and grasp the pollution situation and strains of Legionella pneumophila in public places in Nanjing city distribution.Method:Samples in water and soils of twelve stores and hospitals were collected,Legionella pneumophila were detected and identified by tradtional culture and real-time PCR. Result:234 samples were collected(water 88 samples,soil 146 samples)and 9 Legionella pneumophila strains were isolated used culture methods(the main type of Lp1 type),the detection rates of pneumophila was 3.85%. while 47 samples were tested positive using Real-time PCR (the main type of Lp1 type). The detection rates of pneumophila were 20.08%. The detection rate of positive comparative difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion:Legionella pneumophila are existed in public places of Nanjing. Legionella pneumophila detection rate is higher by Real-time PCR than traditional culture,and it is more sensitive than culture methods.

著录项

  • 来源
    《中国医学创新》 |2014年第14期|117-118119|共3页
  • 作者单位

    南京市疾病预防控制中心 江苏 南京 210003;

    南京市疾病预防控制中心 江苏 南京 210003;

    南京市疾病预防控制中心 江苏 南京 210003;

    南京市疾病预防控制中心 江苏 南京 210003;

    南京市疾病预防控制中心 江苏 南京 210003;

  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    嗜肺军团菌; 荧光PCR法; 公共场所;

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号