首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Epidemiology >A systematic literature review on the efficacy–effectiveness gap: comparison of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of glucose-lowering drugs

【2h】

A systematic literature review on the efficacy–effectiveness gap: comparison of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of glucose-lowering drugs

机译：关于疗效-效果差距的系统文献综述：降糖药物随机对照试验和观察性研究的比较

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

AimTo identify a potential efficacy–effectiveness gap and possible explanations (drivers of effectiveness) for differences between results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating glucose-lowering drugs.

机译：目的确定潜在的功效-功效差距以及对随机对照试验（RCT）和研究降糖药物的观察性研究之间的差异的可能解释（有效性的驱动因素）。

著录项

期刊名称 Clinical Epidemiology
作者
Mikkel Z Ankarfeldt; Erpur Adalsteinsson; Rolf HH Groenwold; M Sanni Ali; Olaf H Klungel;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2017(9),-1
年度 2017
页码 41–51
总页数 11
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类病毒传染病;
关键词
efficacy–effectiveness gap diabetes mellitus type 2 glucose-lowering drugs hemoglobin A1c literature review;

机译：药效差;糖尿病;2型降糖药;血红蛋白A1c;文献综述;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A systematic literature review on the efficacy–effectiveness gap: comparison of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of glucose-lowering drugs [J] . Mikkel Z Ankarfeldt, Erpur Adalsteinsson, Rolf HH Groenwold, Clinical Epidemiology . 2017,第1期

机译：关于功效-功效差距的系统文献综述：降糖药物的随机对照试验和观察性研究的比较
2. A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE EFFICACY-EFFECTIVENESS GAP: COMPARISON OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES OF GLUCOSE-LOWERING DRUGS [J] . Ankarfeldt M. Z., Adalsteinsson E., Groenwold R. H., Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research . 2016,第7期

机译：功效差距的系统文献综述：随机对照试验的比较和降糖药的观察研究
3. The effectiveness of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines in adults: a systematic review of observational studies and comparison with results from randomised controlled trials [Review] [J] . Conaty S, Watson L, Dinnes J, Vaccine . 2004,第23a24期

机译：肺炎球菌多糖疫苗在成人中的有效性：对观察性研究的系统评价，并与随机对照试验的结果进行比较[评价]
4. Stroke unit of integrative medicine for post stroke comorbid anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials [C] . Lingfeng Zeng, Changrong Meng, Zhaohui Liang, IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine . 2014

机译：中风后合并焦虑和抑郁的中西医结合卒中科：25项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
5. An investigation on the determinants of the effectiveness of anti-hypertensive drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials [D] . Jiang, Yu 2007

机译：抗高血压药物初步预防心血管疾病有效性决定因素的调查 - 随机对照试验的系统综述
6. Comparison of efficacy of treatments for early syphilis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies [O] . Hong-ye Liu, Yan Han, Xiang-sheng Chen, -1

机译：早期梅毒的疗效比较：随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统评价和网络荟萃分析
7. A systematic literature review on the efficacyndash;effectiveness gap: comparison of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of glucose-lowering drugs [O] . Mikkel Ankarfeldt, Erpur Adalsteinsson, Rolf Groenwold, 2017

机译：效能效率差距的系统文献综述：随机对照试验的比较和葡萄糖降低药物的观察研究

A systematic literature review on the efficacy–effectiveness gap: comparison of randomized controlled trials and observational studies of glucose-lowering drugs

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅