首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>CBE Life Sciences Education >Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Science Reasoning among Undergraduate Thesis Writers
【2h】

Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Science Reasoning among Undergraduate Thesis Writers

机译:了解本科论文作者批判性思维与科学推理之间的复杂关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Developing critical-thinking and scientific reasoning skills are core learning objectives of science education, but little empirical evidence exists regarding the interrelationships between these constructs. Writing effectively fosters students’ development of these constructs, and it offers a unique window into studying how they relate. In this study of undergraduate thesis writing in biology at two universities, we examine how scientific reasoning exhibited in writing (assessed using the Biology Thesis Assessment Protocol) relates to general and specific critical-thinking skills (assessed using the California Critical Thinking Skills Test), and we consider implications for instruction. We find that scientific reasoning in writing is strongly related to inference, while other aspects of science reasoning that emerge in writing (epistemological considerations, writing conventions, etc.) are not significantly related to critical-thinking skills. Science reasoning in writing is not merely a proxy for critical thinking. In linking features of students’ writing to their critical-thinking skills, this study 1) provides a bridge to prior work suggesting that engagement in science writing enhances critical thinking and 2) serves as a foundational step for subsequently determining whether instruction focused explicitly on developing critical-thinking skills (particularly inference) can actually improve students’ scientific reasoning in their writing.
机译:培养批判性思维和科学推理能力是科学教育的核心学习目标,但是关于这些构架之间的相互关系的经验证据很少。写作有效地促进了学生对这些结构的发展,并且为研究它们之间的关系提供了一个独特的窗口。在对两所大学的生物学本科论文写作的研究中,我们研究了书面展示的科学推理(使用生物学论文评估协议评估)与一般和特定的批判性思维技能(使用加利福尼亚批判性思维技能测试进行评估)之间的关系,我们会考虑对教学的影响。我们发现,写作中的科学推理与推理密切相关,而写作中出现的科学推理的其他方面(病因学考虑,写作习惯等)与批判性思维技能没有显着关系。书面科学推理不仅是批判性思维的代表。在将学生写作的特征与他们的批判性思维技能联系起来的过程中,这项研究1)提供了与先前工作的桥梁,表明从事科学写作可以增强批判性思维; 2)是随后确定教学是否明确专注于发展的基础步骤批判性思维能力(尤其是推理能力)实际上可以提高学生写作中的科学推理能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号