首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia
【2h】

UK Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of ‘locking’ plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of adult patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia

机译:英国胫骨远端骨折固定术(UK FixDT):锁定钢板固定与髓内钉固定治疗成年胫骨远端移位骨折的患者的随机对照试验方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionThe treatment of displaced, extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia remains controversial. These injuries are difficult to manage due to limited soft tissue cover, poor vascularity of the area and proximity to the ankle joint. Surgical treatment options are expanding and include locked intramedullary nails, plate and screw fixation and external fixator systems. The nail and plate options are most commonly used in the UK, but controversy exists over which treatment is most clinically and cost-effective. In this multicentre randomised controlled trial we aim to assess ratings of disability 6 months postinjury in patients who have sustained a distal tibia fracture treated with either an intramedullary nail or plate and locking screw fixation.
机译:引言胫骨远端移位的关节外骨折的治疗仍存在争议。由于软组织覆盖有限,该区域的血管稀疏以及靠近踝关节,这些伤害难以处理。外科治疗选择正在扩大,包括锁定的髓内钉,钢板和螺钉固定以及外部固定器系统。钉子和钢板选项在英国最常用,但是关于哪种治疗方法在临床上和成本效益方面都存在争议。在这项多中心随机对照试验中,我们的目的是评估经髓内钉或钢板固定并用螺钉固定治疗而患有胫骨远端骨折的患者在受伤后6个月内的残疾等级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号