首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Comparison of Autoclave and Ethylene Oxide-Sterilized Membrane Filters Used in Water Quality Studies
【2h】

Comparison of Autoclave and Ethylene Oxide-Sterilized Membrane Filters Used in Water Quality Studies

机译:高压釜和环氧乙烷灭菌膜过滤器在水质研究中的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters manufactured by Gelman, Millipore, and Sartorius were field tested for their recovery of total coliforms, fecal coliforms, fecal streptococci, and heterotrophs. The data were analyzed by using split-plot analysis of variance and significance tests. Membranes were also tested for pH and toxicity using Escherichia coli. The mean data summaries indicated that Gelman membrane filters generally produced the highest counts during the field studies. Statistical analyses of the March data showed that there were significant differences between membrane filters at 1% level; however, statistical analyses of June data revealed no significant differences except in total coliform recoveries. Toxicity tests at 35 C indicated that Gelman and Millipore autoclaved membrane filters were able to recover 92% of the test organisms. Toxicity tests performed at 44.5 C revealed that no membranes were able to recover more than 40% of the test organisms. Since differences were found in the ability of the three brands of membrane filters to recover bacteria from natural and controlled sources, membrane filters from different manufacturers cannot be readily interchanged. There is a need for a standardized procedure for testing bacterial recovery by membrane filters.
机译:对Gelman,Millipore和Sartorius生产的高压灭菌器和环氧乙烷灭菌的膜滤器进行了现场测试,以检测其总大肠菌,粪便大肠菌,粪便链球菌和异养菌的回收率。通过使用方差和显着性检验的分裂图分析来分析数据。还使用大肠杆菌测试了膜的pH和毒性。平均数据摘要表明,在实地研究期间,Gelman膜过滤器通常产生最高计数。 3月数据的统计分析表明,在1%的水平下,膜过滤器之间存在显着差异;但是,对6月数据的统计分析表明,除了大肠菌群的总回收率外,没有显着差异。在35°C下的毒性测试表明,盖尔曼(Gelman)和密理博(Millipore)高压灭菌的膜滤池能够回收92%的测试生物。在44.5 C下进行的毒性测试表明,没有膜能够回收超过40%的测试生物。由于发现三个品牌的膜滤器从自然和受控来源回收细菌的能力存在差异,因此不同制造商的膜滤器不能轻易互换。需要用于通过膜过滤器测试细菌回收的标准化程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号