• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medical Ethics >Some comments on Dr Iglesiass paper In vitro fertilisation: the major issues.
【2h】

Some comments on Dr Iglesiass paper In vitro fertilisation: the major issues.

机译：对Iglesias博士的论文体外受精：主要问题发表了一些评论。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In an article in an earlier edition of the Journal of Medical Ethics (1) Dr Iglesias bases her analysis upon the mediaeval interpretation of Platonic metaphysics and Aristotelian logic as given by Aquinas. Propositional forms are applied to the analysis of experience. This results in a very abstract analysis. The essential connection of events and their changing temporal relationships are ignored. The dichotomy between body and soul is a central concept. The unchanging elements in experience are assumed to be more real than the actual world of experienced process. Such a view makes the analysis of the temporal factors in experience impossible. Its abstractness is quite unsuitable for the analysis of the ontological structure and development of the neonate from fertilisation to birth. A N Whitehead made the notion of organism central to his philosophy. He refused to place human experience outside nature, or admit dualism. His philosophy of organism is an attempt to uncover the essential elements connecting human experience with the physical and biological sciences. Time, change and process are, in his view, more real than the static abstractions obtainable by the use of the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. Use of the latter negates the essential connectedness of events and the importance of temporarily and change (2). In this paper I argue that the embryo, being an organism, is not analysable in terms of thinghood. It is a process. To apply Aristotelian logical concepts to it is to distort the real nature of the datum.
机译：在早期版本的《医学伦理学》（1）中，伊格莱西亚斯博士的分析基于阿奎那给出的柏拉图形而上学和亚里士多德逻辑的中世纪解释。命题形式适用于经验分析。这导致了非常抽象的分析。事件的本质联系及其变化的时间关系被忽略。身体与灵魂之间的二分法是一个中心概念。经验中不变的元素被假定为比经验过程的实际世界更真实。这样的观点使得无法分析经验中的时间因素。它的抽象性非常不适合分析新生儿从受精到出生的本体结构和发育。 N怀特海（N Whitehead）将有机体的概念作为其哲学的核心。他拒绝将人类经验置于自然之外，也拒绝承认二元论。他的生物哲学是试图发现将人类经验与物理和生物科学联系起来的基本要素。在他看来，时间，变化和过程比通过放错位置的具体性的谬误所获得的静态抽象更为真实。后者的使用否定了事件的本质联系以及暂时性和变化的重要性（2）。在本文中，我认为，作为生物体的胚胎在物联网方面无法进行分析。这是一个过程。将亚里士多德的逻辑概念应用于该逻辑概念是扭曲了基准面的真实本质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号