• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison Between Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) and Adult-Driven Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention on Disruptive Behaviors in Public School Children with Autism
【2h】

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison Between Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) and Adult-Driven Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention on Disruptive Behaviors in Public School Children with Autism

机译：枢纽反应治疗（PRT）与成人驱动的应用行为分析（ABA）干预对公立自闭症儿童破坏行为的干预作用的随机临床试验比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Children with autism often demonstrate disruptive behaviors during demanding teaching tasks. Language intervention can be particularly difficult as it involves social and communicative areas, which are challenging for this population. The purpose of this study was to compare two intervention conditions, a naturalistic approach, Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) with a structured ABA approach on disruptive behavior during language intervention in the public schools. A Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) design was used with two groups of children, matched according to age, sex and mean length of utterance. The data showed that the children demonstrated significantly lower levels of disruptive behavior during the PRT condition. The results are discussed with respect to antecedent manipulations that may be helpful in reducing disruptive behavior.
机译：自闭症儿童经常在要求苛刻的教学任务中表现出破坏性行为。语言干预可能特别困难，因为它涉及社交和交流领域，这对这一人群而言是挑战。这项研究的目的是比较两种干预条件，一种自然主义方法，关键反应治疗（PRT）和一种结构化ABA方法，以解决公立学校语言干预期间的破坏行为。两组儿童均采用了随机临床试验（RCT）设计，根据年龄，性别和平均发声长度进行匹配。数据显示，儿童在PRT病情期间表现出明显较低的破坏性行为水平。针对可能有助于减少破坏性行为的先前操作对结果进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号