• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of autism and developmental disorders >A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison Between Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) and Adult-Driven Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention on Disruptive Behaviors in Public School Children with Autism
【24h】

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison Between Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) and Adult-Driven Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention on Disruptive Behaviors in Public School Children with Autism

机译：枢纽反应治疗（PRT）与成人驱动的应用行为分析（ABA）干预对公立学校自闭症儿童破坏行为的随机临床试验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Children with autism often demonstrate disruptive behaviors during demanding teaching tasks. Language intervention can be particularly difficult as it involves social and communicative areas, which are challenging for this population. The purpose of this study was to compare two intervention conditions, a naturalistic approach, Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) with an adult-directed ABA approach on disruptive behavior during language intervention in the public schools. A randomized clinical trial design was used with two groups of children, matched according to age, sex and mean length of utterance. The data showed that the children demonstrated significantly lower levels of disruptive behavior during the PRT condition. The results are discussed with respect to antecedent manipulations that may be helpful in reducing disruptive behavior.
机译：自闭症儿童经常在要求苛刻的教学任务中表现出破坏性行为。语言干预可能特别困难，因为它涉及社交和交际领域，这对于该人群而言具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是比较两种干预条件，一种自然主义的方法，即枢纽反应治疗（PRT）与一种成人指导的ABA方法在公立学校进行语言干预时的破坏性行为。随机临床试验设计用于两组儿童，根据年龄，性别和平均发声长度进行匹配。数据显示，儿童在PRT病情期间表现出明显较低的破坏性行为水平。针对可能有助于减少破坏性行为的先前操作对结果进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号