• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? Response effort moderates the effect of cleanliness priming on moral judgments
【2h】

Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? Response effort moderates the effect of cleanliness priming on moral judgments

机译：清洁度会影响道德判断吗？反应努力减轻了清洁启动对道德判断的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Whether cleanliness influences moral judgments has recently become a topic of debate in the psychological literature. After the initial report that activating the notion of physical purity can result in less severe moral judgments (), a direct replication () with much larger sample sizes failed to yield similar findings. The current paper examines the possibility that only non-conscious activation of the cleanliness concept, as achieved in participants with low response effort on priming materials, can produce the expected effect. An online replication (Study 1, N = 214) provided evidence that, when participants exerted low (yet still acceptable) levels of response effort to the experimental material, cleanliness priming led to more lenient moral judgments than neutral priming. An online experiment (Study 2, N = 440; replicated in Study 2a, N = 436) manipulating participants’ effort on the priming task (low vs. high) supported the hypothesized mechanism. Specifically, respondents in the low response effort group were instructed to complete the priming task as quickly as possible without too much attention, and the cleanliness priming resulted in less extreme moral judgments than the neutral condition as expected. In contrast, respondents in the high response effort group were instructed to perform to the best of their ability on the priming task, with a non-significant difference on moral ratings between cleanliness and neutral conditions. In addition to helping resolve the controversy regarding the cleanliness hypothesis, the current paper calls into attention the role of response effort in the execution and replication of priming studies.
机译：清洁度是否会影响道德判断，最近已成为心理学文献中的一个争论话题。最初的报告称激活物理纯净度的概念可能会导致不太严厉的道德判断（），但直接复制（）的样本量大得多时，未能得出相似的发现。本文探讨了只有在无意识地启动底漆材料的参与者中实现清洁概念的无意识激活才能产生预期效果的可能性。在线复制（研究1，N = 214）提供的证据表明，当参与者对实验材料做出低水平（但仍可接受）的反应时，清洁启动比中立启动更宽容的道德判断。一项在线实验（研究2，N = 440；在研究2a中重复，N = 436）操纵参与者对启动任务的努力（从低到高），从而支持了这种推测的机制。具体来说，低反应努力组中的受访者被指示在没有过多关注的情况下尽快完成启动任务，并且清洁启动导致的道德判断比预期的中立条件要少。相比之下，高响应努力组的受访者被指示在启动任务中尽其所能，在清洁度和中立条件之间的道德等级上没有显着差异。除了有助于解决有关清洁度假设的争议外，本论文还提请注意响应工作在启动和复制启动研究中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号