首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BJS Open >Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials case-matched studies and cohort studies

【2h】

Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials case-matched studies and cohort studies

机译：研究设计中直肠癌外肠癌的差异：荟萃分析随机临床试验案例匹配的研究和队列研究

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

RCTs are considered the standard in surgical research, whereas case-matched studies and propensity score matching studies are conducted as an alternative option. Both study designs have been used to investigate the potential superiority of robotic surgery over laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. However, no conclusion has been reached regarding whether there are differences in findings according to study design. This study aimed to examine similarities and differences in findings relating to robotic surgery for rectal cancer by study design.

机译：RCT被认为是手术研究的标准，而病例匹配的研究和倾向评分匹配研究是作为替代选择的。两项研究设计都被用于研究直肠癌腹腔镜手术对机器人手术的潜在优越性。然而，没有结论是关于根据研究设计是否存在调查结果的差异。本研究旨在通过研究设计研究与直肠癌机器人手术有关的调查结果的相似性和差异。

著录项

期刊名称 BJS Open
作者
N Hoshino; T Sakamoto; K Hida; Y Takahashi; H Okada; K Obama; T Nakayama;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2021(5),2
年度 2021
页码 zraa067
总页数 10
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, case-matched studies, and cohort studies [J] . N Hoshino, T Sakamoto, K Hida, BJS Open . 2021,第2期

机译：研究设计中直肠癌外肠癌的差异：荟萃分析随机临床试验，匹配研究和队列研究
2. Similarities and differences between study designs in short‐ and long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized, case‐matched, and cohort studies [J] . Nobuaki Hoshino, Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery . 2021,第2期

机译：直肠癌腹腔镜短期和长期成果的研究设计的相似性和差异：随机，符合案例匹配和群组研究的系统回顾与荟萃分析
3. The most appropriate primary outcomes to design clinical trials on Huntington's disease: meta-analyses of cohort studies and randomized placebo-controlled trials [J] . Salem Linda, Saleh Nadine, Youssov Katia, Fundamental & clinical pharmacology. . 2014,第6期

机译：设计亨廷顿氏病临床试验最合适的主要结果：队列研究的荟萃分析和随机安慰剂对照试验
4. The In-depth quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic study of clinical sera derived from the Prospective study of Outcomes in Sporadic versus Hereditary breast cancer (POSH) cohort: The quest for potential prediction biomarkers of pharmacologic effic acy [C] . Roumeliotis T.I., Zeidan B., Vougas K., American Society for Mass Spectrometry Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics . 2011

机译：临床血清的深入定量蛋白质组学和磷蛋白蛋白酶研究源自散发性患者与遗传性乳腺癌（POSH）癌症的前瞻性研究（POSH）队列：寻求药理学效应射频的潜在预测生物标志物
5. Evaluating surgical outcomes: A systematic comparison of evidence from randomized trials and observational studies in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. [D] . Martel, Guillaume. 2012

机译：评估手术效果：腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的随机试验和观察性研究证据的系统比较。
6. Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies [O] . Tim Hundscheid, Esther J. S. Jansen, Wes Onland, 2021

机译：早产儿专利导管疟疾的保守管理 - 一种系统审查和荟萃分析评估随机对照试验与队列研究之间的结果措施的差异
7. Similarities and differences between study designs in short‐ and long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized, case‐matched, and cohort studies [O] . Nobuaki Hoshino, Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, 2020

机译：腹腔镜短期和长期成果研究设计的相似性和差异对直肠癌的开放性低前切除术：随机，案例匹配和队列研究的系统回顾与荟萃分析

Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials case-matched studies and cohort studies

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅