首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Brain Sciences >Active School Breaks and Students’ Attention: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Active School Breaks and Students’ Attention: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

机译:积极的学校休息和学生的注意力:通过Meta分析进行系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

School physical activity breaks are currently being proposed as a way to improve students’ learning. However, there is no clear evidence of the effects of active school breaks on academic-related cognitive outcomes. The present systematic review with meta-analysis scrutinized and synthesized the literature related to the effects of active breaks on students’ attention. On January 12th, 2021, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched for published interventions with counterbalanced cross-over or parallel-groups designs with a control group, including school-based active breaks, objective attentional outcomes, and healthy students of any age. Studies’ results were qualitatively synthesized, and meta-analyses were performed if at least three study groups provided pre-post data for the same measure. Results showed some positive acute and chronic effects of active breaks on attentional outcomes (i.e., accuracy, concentration, inhibition, and sustained attention), especially on selective attention. However, most of the results were not significant. The small number of included studies and their heterogeneous design are the primary limitations of the present study. Although the results do not clearly point out the positive effects of active breaks, they do not compromise students’ attention. The key roles of intensity and the leader of the active break are discussed. INPLASY registration number: 202110054.
机译:学校体育活动休息目前正在提出改善学生学习的一种方式。但是,没有明确证据证据了积极学校突破对与学术相关的认知结果的影响。目前对Meta分析的系统审查仔细审查并综合了与主动休息对学生注意的影响相关的文献。在1月12日,2021年,PubMed,Psycinfo,Scopus,Sportsiscus和Spects Spore的公布干预措施,与对照组的平衡交叉或平行组设计,包括基于学校的主动休息,客观的注意事项和任何年龄的健康学生。研究结果是定性合成的,并且如果至少有三个研究组提供相同措施的后数据预先数据,则进行荟萃分析。结果表明,主动突破对注意力结果(即,准确,浓缩,抑制和持续注意)有一些正急性和慢性效应,特别是在选择性关注方面。然而,大多数结果并不重要。少数包括的研究及其异质设计是本研究的主要局限性。虽然结果没有明确指出积极休息的积极影响,但它们并不损害学生的注意力。讨论了强度和主动休息的领导者的关键作用。置换注册号:202110054。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号