首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis >The Effects of Prompting and Feedback on Drivers Stopping at Stop Signs
【2h】

The Effects of Prompting and Feedback on Drivers Stopping at Stop Signs

机译:提示和反馈对驾驶员在停车标志处停车的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Complete stops at a high-traffic intersection on the campus of a public university were increased with a prompting and consequence intervention. Data were collected at two opposing stop signs (Stop A and Stop B); however, the intervention was implemented only at Stop A. During the intervention, a volunteer stood next to Stop A holding a poster that read, “Please Stop—I Care,” with “Thank You For Stopping” on the reverse side. The poster was held by the volunteer so that drivers approaching Stop A could read the sign. Drivers approaching Stop B could see the volunteer but could not read the sign. When vehicles approaching Stop A made a complete stop, the volunteer flashed the “thank you” side of the poster to the driver. The strategy was evaluated using a multielement design. The intervention increased stops completed at Stop A from a baseline average of 13% to an intervention average of 52%. Stop B also showed improved stopping, from a baseline average of 6% to an intervention average of 28%. Data showed no relation between complete stops made and the drivers' use of turn signals and safety belts.
机译:在提示和后果干预下,增加了公立大学校园中交通繁忙的十字路口的停车站。在两个相对的停车标志(停车A和停车B)处收集数据;但是,干预仅在Stop A处实施。在干预期间,一名志愿者站在Stop A旁边,拿着写有“请停下来,我在乎”的标语,背面写着“谢谢您停下来”。海报是由志愿者持有的,以便驶近车站A的驾驶员可以阅读该标志。驶向车站B的驾驶员可以看到志愿者,但看不见路标。当驶向A站的车辆完全停下来时,志愿者向驾驶员闪了招贴的“谢谢”一面。使用多元素设计对策略进行了评估。干预使在Stop A处完成的停留从基线平均值13%增加到干预平均值52%。停止B也显示出更好的停止,从基线平均6%到干预平均28%。数据显示完全停止与驾驶员使用转向信号灯和安全带之间没有关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号