• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Should We All be Scientists? Re-thinking Laboratory Research as a Calling
【2h】

Should We All be Scientists? Re-thinking Laboratory Research as a Calling

机译：我们都应该成为科学家吗？重新思考实验室研究的呼唤

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In recent years there have been major shifts in how the role of science—and scientists—are understood. The critical examination of scientific expertise within the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) are increasingly eroding notions of the “otherness” of scientists. It would seem to suggest that anyone can be a scientist—when provided with the appropriate training and access to data. In contrast, however, ethnographic evidence from the scientific community tells a different story. Scientists are quick to recognize that not everyone can—or should—be a scientist. Appealing to notions such as “good hands” or “gut feelings”, scientists narrate a distinction between good and bad scientists that cannot be reduced to education, access, or opportunity. The key to good science requires scientists to express an intuitive feeling for their discipline, but also that individuals derive considerable personal satisfaction from their work. Discussing this personal joy in—and “fittingness” of—scientific occupations using the fields of STS, ethics and science policy is highly problematic. In this paper we turn to theology discourse to analyze the notion of “callings” as a means of understanding this issue. Callings highlight the identification and examination of individual talents to determine fit occupations for specific persons. Framing science as a calling represents a novel view of research that places the talents and dispositions of individuals and their relationship to the community at the center of flourishing practices.
机译：近年来，人们对科学和科学家角色的理解发生了重大变化。对科学和技术研究（STS）领域中的科学专业知识的严格审查正在越来越淡化科学家“其他”的观念。似乎暗示任何人都可以成为科学家—只要接受了适当的培训并可以访问数据。然而，相比之下，来自科学界的人种学证据则讲述了一个不同的故事。科学家很快意识到，并不是每个人都可以或应该成为科学家。呼吁“好手”或“胆量”之类的观念的科学家叙述了好科学家与坏科学家之间的区别，这种区别不能归结为受教育，获得机会或机会。好的科学的关键要求科学家对自己的学科表达一种直观的感觉，而且还要求个人从他们的工作中获得可观的个人满意度。使用STS，道德和科学政策领域来讨论这种对科学职业的个人快乐和“适合性”是非常成问题的。在本文中，我们转向神学话语来分析“呼唤”的概念，以此作为理解这一问题的一种手段。电话突出显示了对单个人才的识别和检查，以确定适合特定人员的职业。将科学定为呼唤代表了一种新颖的研究观点，这种观点将个人的才能和性格及其与社区的关系置于繁荣实践的中心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号