• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Academy of Management Perspectives >CORPORATE SOCIOPOLITICAL INVOLVEMENT: A REFLECTION OF WHOSE PREFERENCES?
【24h】

CORPORATE SOCIOPOLITICAL INVOLVEMENT: A REFLECTION OF WHOSE PREFERENCES?

机译：企业的社会政治参与：对谁的偏好的反思？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The management literature has devoted increased attention to nonmarket activities of firms, such as political involvement and social responsibility, including philanthropy. While these activities may be presumed to have the intent of improving the competitive position of firms or enhancing their reputation, firms have recently increased their support for or opposition to a wide array of politically charged social issues with no direct performance motivation. These "sociopolitical issues" are vastly different from corporate social responsibility and corporate political activities, as they are divisive, emotionally charged, and institutionally contested social issues. In this article, we explore sociopolitical issues and develop a distinct model that relies on multiple theoretical perspectives agency theory and a push-versus-pull perspective of stakeholder theory to provide complementary or at times competing explanations for firm involvement in such controversial issues. We also explore the contexts (or facilitating institutional environments) that enable management to get involved in sociopolitical issues. In addition to drawing attention to this growing phenomenon, the article provides guidelines for future research on corporate participation in politically charged social issues.
机译：管理文献更加关注公司的非市场活动，例如政治参与和社会责任，包括慈善事业。尽管这些活动可能旨在改善公司的竞争地位或提高其声誉，但公司最近在没有直接绩效动机的情况下增加了对各种政治上带有社会色彩的社会问题的支持或反对。这些“社会政治问题”与公司的社会责任和公司的政治活动有很大的不同，因为它们是分裂性的，情绪激动的以及制度上有争议的社会问题。在本文中，我们探讨了社会政治问题，并开发了一个独特的模型，该模型依赖于多种理论观点的代理理论和利益相关者理论的推拉观点，为公司介入此类有争议的问题提供补充或有时竞争的解释。我们还将探讨使管理层能够介入社会政治问题的环境（或促进制度环境）。除了提请注意这种日益严重的现象外，本文还提供了有关公司参与政治性社会问题的未来研究的指南。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Academy of Management Perspectives》 |2016年第4期|384-403|共20页
  • 作者

    Nalick Michael; Josefy Matthew; Zardkoohi Asghar; Bierman Leonard;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Memphis, Dept Management, Management, Memphis, TN 38152 USA;

    Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Management & Entrepreneurship, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA;

    Texas A&M Univ, Dept Management, Business Adm, College Stn, TX 77843 USA;

    Texas A&M Univ, Mays Business Sch, Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号