...
首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk
【24h】

Attitudes towards vehicle driving behaviour: Categorising and contextualising risk

机译:对车辆驾驶行为的态度:将风险分类和情境化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In driving motorised vehicles, the amount of risk accepted varies between individuals. Traditional theories of risk have tended to focus on a lack of skill as a function of risk taking and have ignored social motivations and attitudes for engaging in risk. This study aims to categorise and contextualise risk taking behaviour in relation to car driving through studying the motivations and attitudes towards risk. The results were tested on a representative sample (n = 1655) of the UK driving population and four groups were identified based on motivations; those that took risk unintentionally formed the largest group. Three smaller groups who took deliberate risks were also found, a reactive risk taking group who took risks when reacting to stress or being in a hurry, a calculated risk taking group who took risks when they felt it was safe to do so, such as late at night or on well-known roads, and a continuous risk taking group who frequently took risks for their own sake.
机译:在驾驶机动车辆时,个人所接受的风险大小会有所不同。传统的风险理论倾向于将技巧的缺乏作为冒险的一种功能,而忽视了从事风险的社会动机和态度。本研究旨在通过研究对风险的动机和态度,对与汽车驾驶有关的冒险行为进行分类和关联。对英国驾驶人口的代表性样本(n = 1655)进行了测试,并根据动机确定了四个小组。那些无意间冒险的人构成了最大的群体。还发现了三个较小的承担故意风险的小组,一个被动应对风险小组在应对压力或急忙时承担风险,一个有计划的冒险承担小组在认为安全的情况下承担了风险,例如后期在晚上或在著名的道路上,还有一个不断冒险的团队,他们经常为了自己的利益冒险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号