...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of water resources >Discussion on 'Large floods in South East Queensland: is it valid to assume they occur randomly?' by GM McMahon and AS Kiem
【24h】

Discussion on 'Large floods in South East Queensland: is it valid to assume they occur randomly?' by GM McMahon and AS Kiem

机译：讨论“昆士兰州东南部的大洪水：假设它们随机发生是否合法？”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

No doubt the authors' paper was received with many mutterings of 'You have to be out of your cotton-pickin' minds, Piglets. I've been doing flood frequency analyses since I was in three-cornered pants and the idea that floods come in cycles has to be total bovine excrement!' It is understandable that long-term compliance with Australian Rainfall and Runoff (Pattison 1977; Pilgrim 1987; Ball et al. 2016) could result in practitioners truly believing that annual floods are perfectly random entities and that they always occur according to the Log-Pearson Type Ⅲ (LP3) distribution.
机译：毫无疑问，收到作者的论文时暗含着“小猪仔”的念头。自从我穿着三角裤以来，我就一直在进行洪水频率分析，洪水以周期出现的想法必须是全部牛粪！可以理解，长期遵守澳大利亚的降雨和径流（Pattison 1977； Pilgrim 1987； Ball等人2016）可能使从业者真正相信，年度洪水是完全随机的实体，根据Log-Pearson的说法，它们总是发生的Ⅲ型（LP3）分布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号