...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Aviation Week & Space Technology >GOING CONCERNS
【24h】

GOING CONCERNS

机译：持续关注

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

THE AEROSPACE AND DEFENSEindustries are usually described as staid. And while legacy company names can be and have been subsumed, usually due to acquisition, it is rare that new names become preeminent in the public's mind.Now that could be changing. A cadre of small companies is increasingly standing out for contract wins, especially in defense, thanks to the growing federal budget. Some observers see them as minor mid-tier players, but Steven Grundman, the George Lund Fellow for Emerging Defense Challenges at the Atlantic Council, calls them the "big smalls." Usually with headcounts measured in the hundreds, or possibly thousands, of employees, and with annual revenue falling under $2 billion, they are almost a class of their own. "These are not small companies . . . but they are quite distinct from the big, diversified companies," notes Grundman, who recently spotlighted a few for inclusion in his Captains of Industry panel series.
机译：航空航天和国防工业通常被认为是固定的。虽然可以通过收购使用旧的公司名称，但现在很少有新名称在公众心目中占主导地位。 r n现在这种情况可能会发生变化。由于联邦预算的增加，越来越多的小公司在合同中脱颖而出，尤其是在国防方面。一些观察家认为他们只是中层的次要角色，但大西洋理事会新兴国防挑战研究员乔治·隆德曼（George Lund Fellow）的史蒂芬·格伦曼（Steven Grundman）称他们为“小公司”。通常，员工人数为数百甚至数千员工，并且年收入低于20亿美元，几乎是他们自己的一类。 “这些公司不是小公司……但是它们与大型，多元化的公司截然不同。”格伦德曼指出，他最近特别指出了一些要纳入他的《工业队长》专题讨论会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号