首页> 外文期刊>Baltic Journal of Management >Leadership in different kinds of regional development networks
【24h】

Leadership in different kinds of regional development networks

机译:领导各种区域发展网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of network leadership in meeting the requirements for regional development networks imposed by the network society. Design/methodology/approach – A new framework of three different archetypes of regional development networks was devised. The characteristics of the different networks and the requirements they set for network leadership were assessed as a case study in the Lahti Region, Finland. A special panel of experts of three highly experienced network leaders was organized as part of the present study. Their task was to assess the differences concerning network leadership in different regional development networks. The session was conducted in the (niin sanottu means it was not an inspiration) Inspiration Center in the Lahti Region. Inspiration Center is a platform for brainstorming and stimulation, designed especially to arrive at ideas and form opinions through teamwork. The method used was a half-structured group discussion, planned especially for the purpose of the present study. The method was used to form a convergent expert assessment among the participants. Findings – The essential differences of the types of regional development networks make it insufficient to talk about network leadership as a general concept. It is important to identify and understand the differences in network leadership required by the different archetypes of regional development networks. Originality/value – The paper combines leadership, network leadership, and regional development in a novel way.
机译:目的–研究的目的是评估网络领导者在满足网络社会对区域发展网络的要求方面的有效性。设计/方法/方法–设计了一个新的框架,该框架包含了三种不同的区域发展网络原型。在芬兰拉赫蒂地区,通过案例研究评估了不同网络的特征及其对网络领导力的要求。作为本研究的一部分,组织了一个由三名经验丰富的网络领导者组成的专家特别小组。他们的任务是评估有关不同区域发展网络中网络领导力的差异。会议在拉赫蒂地区的灵感中心举行(niin sanottu表示这不是灵感)。灵感中心是一个集思广益和激发灵感的平台,旨在通过团队合作达成想法并形成意见。所使用的方法是半结构化的小组讨论,特别是针对本研究的目的而计划的。该方法用于形成参与者之间的融合专家评估。调查结果–区域发展网络类型的本质差异使得不足以将网络领导作为一个总体概念进行讨论。重要的是要确定和理解区域发展网络的不同原型所要求的网络领导力的差异。原创性/价值–本文以新颖的方式将领导力,网络领导力和区域发展结合在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号