• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Environmental Law Reports >Thompson v. BFI Canada Inc.
【24h】

Thompson v. BFI Canada Inc.

机译：汤普森诉BFI加拿大公司

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Environmental law-Liability for environmental harm - Nuisance - Liability in particular cases - Miscellaneous-Interlocutory injunction - Plaintiffs T and T Ltd. (together "apple market owner") were owners and operators of farming business, including retail apple market, located near landfill owned and operated by defendants B Inc. and R Inc. - B Inc. owned property adjacent to landfill, on which it was constructing berms that did not require regulatory intervention - Apple market owner brought motion for interlocutory injunction restraining construction of berms - Motion dismissed - Apple market owner's action involved serious issue to be tried on basis of nuisance, but threshold was only just met - Apple market owner failed to establish that they suffered harm and would continue to suffer greater harm if injunction was not granted - Any detrimental consequences damages could be remedied by damages - Given absence of any evidence of irreparable harm, apple market owner's delay in bringing this motion, and tenuous cause of action in nuisance, apple market owner could not meet burden required to obtain interlocutory injunction.
机译：环境法-对环境造成损害的责任-滋扰-特殊情况下的责任-杂项中间禁令-原告T和T有限公司（统称“苹果市场所有者”）是位于垃圾填埋场附近的农业业务（包括苹果零售市场）的所有者和经营者由被告B Inc.和R Inc.拥有和经营-B Inc.在垃圾填埋场附近拥有的财产，正在其上建造不需要监管干预的护堤-苹果市场所有者提出了以临时禁令约束护堤建设的动议-动议被驳回-苹果市场所有者的诉讼涉及严重的问题，需要在滋扰的基础上进行审理，但只是达到了门槛-苹果市场所有者未能证明他们遭受了伤害，如果不执行禁制令将继续遭受更大的伤害-任何有害后果的损害赔偿可以通过损害赔偿来弥补-鉴于没有任何无法弥补的损害的证据，苹果市场所有人延迟提货鉴于此动议，以及令人讨厌的诉讼因由，苹果市场所有人无法承受获得临时禁令所需的负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号