• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Water Resources Journal >Municipal flood risk sharing in Canada: A policy instrument analysis
【24h】

Municipal flood risk sharing in Canada: A policy instrument analysis

机译：加拿大市政洪水风险分担：政策工具分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although municipal governments have long dealt with flood hazards, escalating damage to property and infrastructure has prompted greater interest in policies that share the responsibility for risk reduction and the burden of costs with other levels of government and non-governmental actors. However, flood risk sharing is a significant policy challenge, because it requires consideration of the consequences of flooding, in addition to its probability, and it involves engagement with a broader pool of stakeholders in managing flood risk. Scholarly literature on risk sharing tools available to Canadian municipalities and the extent of their adoption is scarce. To address this gap, this paper identifies a set of policy tools by which municipalities can share flood risk, and assesses how and the extent to which they are adopted in the cities of Calgary, Alberta, and Toronto, Ontario. This analysis reveals that, despite a diverse range of policy options, risk sharing tools are underutilized and continue to be informed by single hazard-based design standards rather than an assessment of flood risk.
机译：尽管市政府长期以来一直在处理洪水灾害，但对财产和基础设施的破坏不断加剧，促使人们对与其他级别的政府和非政府组织共同承担降低风险和负担成本的政策产生了更大的兴趣。但是，洪水风险分担是一项重大的政策挑战，因为它不仅需要考虑洪水的可能性，还需要考虑洪水的后果，并且需要与更广泛的利益相关方合作来管理洪水风险。有关加拿大市政当局可用的风险分担工具及其采用程度的学术文献很少。为了解决这一差距，本文确定了一套政策工具，市政当局可以利用这些工具来分担洪水风险，并评估在阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里市和安大略省多伦多市采用这些政策工具的方式和程度。该分析表明，尽管采取了各种各样的政策选择，但风险共享工具并未得到充分利用，并且继续以基于单一危害的设计标准（而非洪水风险评估）为依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号