首页> 外文期刊>Wastes Management >Insights on incineration
【24h】

Insights on incineration

机译:焚烧洞察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

At the beginning of April, John Grogan MP proposed a Westminster Hall debate on the regulation of incineration of waste - or energy from waste (EfW) as it is referred to more commonly. He put forward three proposals: introduce a moratorium on EfW; enforce the waste hierarchy properly; and seriously consider an incineration tax. On the first point, Grogan claimed that 'we have quite enough incinerators to deal with residual waste at the moment'. The UK is, in fact, experiencing a significant under-capacity of EfW, which is why we landfill approximately 12Mt of household and commercial waste, and send around 3.5Mt of residual waste for treatment overseas. There is a question about how much capacity we will need going forward. At the end of 2017, ESA commissioned Tolvik Consulting to synthesise different estimates and it found that, even if we meet 65 per cent recycling, there is still a risk of under-capacity - and we will still be heavily reliant on exports. So introducing a moratorium on EfW would risk a residual waste-treatment crisis that would result in having to open new landfills.
机译:在4月初,约翰格洛根MP提出了一位关于监管废物焚烧的威斯敏斯特霍尔,或者从废物(EFW)的调节,因为它更常见。他提出了三项建议:在EFW上介绍暂停;正确实施废物层次结构;并认真考虑焚烧税。在第一点,格戈根声称“我们有足够的焚化炉来处理此刻的残余浪费。事实上,英国实际上遇到了efw的显着不足,这就是为什么我们填埋大约12毫升的家庭和商业浪费,并派出约3.5亿左右的海外废物治疗。有一个关于我们需要的能力的问题。截至2017年底,ESA委托托尔维克咨询综合不同估计,发现,即使我们达到65%的回收,仍有风险,我们仍将大力依赖出口。因此,在EFW上引入暂停将危险危险将导致危机危机,这将导致开放新的垃圾填埋场。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Wastes Management》 |2019年第3期|45-45|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号