...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >Breaking the impasse: towards a new regime for international climate governance
【24h】

Breaking the impasse: towards a new regime for international climate governance

机译：打破僵局：建立国际气候治理新制度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The reality of the current international order makes it imperative that a just and effective climate regime should balance the historical responsibility of developed countries with the increasing absolute emissions from many developing nations. The key pillars are briefly proposed for a new international climate architecture that envisions replacing the current annex system with two new annexes: Annex α, for countries with high current emissions and historically high emissions, and Annex β, for countries with high current emissions and historically low emissions. Countries in both annexes would implement legally binding targets under this framework. Additionally, this proposal includes alterations and revisions to funding and technology transfer mechanisms to correct for weaknesses and inequities under the current Kyoto architecture. The proposed framework stems from a belief that a top-down, international approach to climate policy remains the most effective for ensuring environmental integrity. Given the slow rate of institutional learning, the reform and improvement of the current system is held as a more efficient course of action than abandoning the progress already achieved. It is argued that the proposed framework could effectively accommodate key equity, environmental integrity, and political feasibility concerns.
机译：当前国际秩序的现实使当务之急是，一个公正有效的气候制度应在发达国家的历史责任与许多发展中国家日益增加的绝对排放量之间取得平衡。简要提出了一个新的国际气候体系结构的主要支柱，该构想设想用两个新的附件代替当前的附件系统：附件α，用于当前排放量大且历史上排放量高的国家，附件β，用于当前排放量大且历史上排放量高的国家低排放。两个附件中的国家都将在该框架下实施具有法律约束力的目标。此外，该提案包括对资金和技术转让机制的更改和修订，以纠正当前《京都议定书》体系下的弱点和不平等现象。提议的框架源于一种信念，即自上而下的国际气候政策方法仍然是确保环境完整性最有效的方法。鉴于机构学习的速度较慢，与放弃已经取得的进展相比，现行制度的改革和完善被认为是更为有效的行动方针。有人认为，提议的框架可以有效地解决关键的公平性，环境完整性和政治可行性问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Climate Policy》 |2013年第6期|777-784|共8页
  • 作者

    MARSHALL GECK; XIAOXUE WENG; CAITLIN BENT; CHUKWUMERIJE OKEREKE; TAYLOR MURRAY; KIRSTY WILSON;

  • 作者单位

    School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QY, UK;

    Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QY, UK;

    Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QY, UK;

    Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QY, UK,School of Human and Environmental Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights Campus, Reading RG6 6AB, UK;

    School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QY, UK;

    Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QY, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    BRIC; burden sharing; climate change policies; climate regime; developed countries; developing countries; equity; post-2012;

    机译：金砖四国负担分担;气候变化政策;气候制度;发达国家;发展中国家;公平;2012年后;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号