• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Communication research >When Should Advice Be Given? Assessing the Role of Sequential Placement of Advice in Supportive Interactions in Two Cultures
【24h】

When Should Advice Be Given? Assessing the Role of Sequential Placement of Advice in Supportive Interactions in Two Cultures

机译：什么时候应该提供建议？评估咨询的顺序放置在两种文化中的支持性互动中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The current study assessed an integrated model of advice giving (Emotional support-Problem inquiry and analysis-Advice) with 572 participants from United States and 540 participants from mainland China. Participants read and responded to a hypothetical scenario in which they received advice from a friend. Advice that was offered following the moves of emotional support and problem inquiry and analysis was judged by both American and Chinese participants to be higher in quality and was more likely to be implemented than advice that did not follow this sequential pattern. Compared to Chinese participants, American participants evaluated advice offered with emotional support or problem inquiry and analysis as higher in quality. Participants with a higher independent self-construal also rated advice offered in conjunction with emotional support or problem inquiry and analysis as higher in quality than participants with a lower independent self-construal.
机译：当前的研究评估了一个综合的建议给予模型（情感支持-问题查询和分析-建议），来自美国的572名参与者和来自中国大陆的540名参与者。参与者阅读并回答了一个假设情景，即他们从朋友那里得到了建议。中美两国参与者都认为，在情感支持，问题询问和分析之后提供的建议质量较高，比不遵循这种顺序模式的建议更有可能实施。与中国参与者相比，美国参与者对通过情感支持或问题询问和分析提供的建议的评价更高。具有较高独立自我建设能力的参与者也将与情感支持或问题询问和分析相结合提供的建议的质量比具有较低独立自我建设能力的参与者的质量更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号