首页> 外文期刊>Computer assisted language learning >Hypertext glosses for foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition: effects of assessment methods
【24h】

Hypertext glosses for foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition: effects of assessment methods

机译:用于外语阅读理解和词汇习得的超文本词汇:评估方法的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compared how three different gloss modes affected college students' L2 reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. The study also compared how results on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition may differ depending on the four assessment methods used. A between-subjects design was employed with three groups of Mandarin-speaking college freshmen. The participants read an English passage, each with different gloss formats: in-text mode, marginal gloss mode, and pop-up mode. The English proficiency level of the participants was elementary. Summary writing and multiple-choice questions were used to assess reading comprehension; word translation and word matching were used to assess vocabulary acquisition. Results of a multivariate analysis of covariance (with proficiency as the covariate) indicated that different assessment methods using the same gloss mode yielded different outcomes. In general, while the marginal gloss mode resulted in the highest scores on the multiple choice test, in-text glosses brought about the best performance in the rest of the tests, and pop-up glosses led to the lowest scores on all four tests. This study suggests that student performance outcomes concerning gloss mode may be assessment specific. Researchers should consider how investigators obtain their outcomes when interpreting the results of a study.
机译:这项研究比较了三种不同的光泽度模式如何影响大学生的二语阅读理解和词汇习得。该研究还比较了理解和词汇习得的结果如何取决于所使用的四种评估方法的不同。受试者之间的设计与三组讲普通话的大学新生一起使用。参与者阅读了英文文章,每种文章都有不同的光泽度格式:文本模式,边际光泽度模式和弹出模式。参与者的英语水平是初级。摘要写作和多项选择题用于评估阅读理解;单词翻译和单词匹配用于评估词汇习得。协方差的多变量分析结果(以熟练程度作为协变量)表明,使用相同光泽度模式的不同评估方法会产生不同的结果。通常,边际光泽度模式在多项选择测试中得分最高,而文本光泽度在其余测试中表现最佳,弹出式光泽度在所有四个测试中得分最低。这项研究表明,关于光泽模式的学生成绩可能是针对评估的。研究人员在解释研究结果时应考虑研究者如何获得结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号