Evidence-based policy: exploring international and interdisciplinary insights

Linda Hantrais; Ashley Thomas Lenihan; Susanne MacGregor

首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary social science >Evidence-based policy: exploring international and interdisciplinary insights

【24h】

Evidence-based policy: exploring international and interdisciplinary insights

机译：循证政策：探索国际和跨学科的见解

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The relationship between international evidence, politics and policy is never straightforward. Politicians sometimes cite comparative findings from social science evidence collected and analysed by international organisations to support policy proposals without sufficient understanding of contextual factors. The media may exploit data from such studies to highlight national policy successes and failures. Academic literature on evidence-based policy is often more interested in identifying policies that work than in investigating the reasons why policy solutions might, or might not, be effective if transferred to other regions. This article explores some of the issues involved by examining the relationship between evidence producers and users in different institutional settings, drawing on case studies in health and social policy to illuminate the complexities of the policy process. In considering possible conditions for successful policy learning across time and space, the authors stress the critical need to take account of socioeconomic, political, cultural and disciplinary contexts.

机译：国际证据，政治和政策之间的关系从来都不是直截了当的。政客有时会引用国际组织收集和分析的社会科学证据的比较结果，以支持政策建议而又不充分了解背景因素。媒体可能会利用此类研究的数据来强调国家政策的成败。有关基于证据的政策的学术文献通常更感兴趣的是确定有效的政策，而不是研究将政策解决方案转移到其他地区可能会或可能不会有效的原因。本文通过研究不同机构环境中证据产生者与使用者之间的关系，并利用卫生和社会政策中的案例研究来阐明政策流程的复杂性，从而探讨其中涉及的一些问题。在考虑跨时空成功学习政策的可能条件时，作者强调了迫切需要考虑社会经济，政治，文化和学科背景。

著录项

来源
《Contemporary social science》 |2015年第2期|101-113|共13页
作者
Linda Hantrais; Ashley Thomas Lenihan; Susanne MacGregor;
展开▼
作者单位

Centre for International Studies, London School of Economics, London, UK,Department of Politics, History and International Relations, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK;

Centre for International Studies, London School of Economics, London, UK,Institute for Law, Science & Global Security, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA;

Centre for History in Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
evidence-based policy; international and interdisciplinary insights; evidence brokerage; policy learning; policy environments;

机译：循证政策;国际和跨学科的见解;证据经纪政策学习;政策环境;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. International and interdisciplinary insights into evidence-based policy [J] . Contemporary social science . 2014,第4期

机译：对基于证据的政策的国际和跨学科见解
2. Exploring the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in Vietnam: Insights for evidence-based cervical cancer prevention policy. [J] . Kim JJ, Kobus KE, Diaz M, Vaccine . 2008,第32期

机译：在越南探索HPV疫苗接种的成本效益：基于证据的宫颈癌预防政策的见解。
3. Institutionalising evidence-based policy: international insights into knowledge brokerage [J] . Ashley Thomas Lenihan Contemporary social science . 2015,第2期

机译：制度化基于证据的政策：对知识经纪的国际见解
4. Industry Policy Insights - Exploring What Matters(PPT) [C] . Kathy Mathers, Lara Moody, Rosemary OBrien TFI/FIRT Fertilizer Outlook and Technology Conference . 2016

机译：行业政策见解 - 探索重要（PPT）
5. The Science-Policy Interface as a Communication Process: Exploring How Policy Decision-Makers Perceive Science-Driven Policy and Make Evidence-Based Decisions on the Nuclear Fuel Cycle [D] . Li, Nan 2015

机译：科学-政策界面作为沟通过程：探讨政策决策者如何看待科学驱动政策并就核燃料循环做出循证决策
6. Core Competencies for Shared Decision Making Training Programs: Insights From an International Interdisciplinary Working Group [O] . France Légaré, Nora Moumjid-Ferdjaoui, Renée Drolet, -1

机译：共享决策培训计划的核心能力：国际跨学科工作组的见解
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考

Evidence-based policy: exploring international and interdisciplinary insights

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅