Institutionalising evidence-based policy: international insights into knowledge brokerage

Ashley Thomas Lenihan

首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary social science >Institutionalising evidence-based policy: international insights into knowledge brokerage

【24h】

Institutionalising evidence-based policy: international insights into knowledge brokerage

机译：制度化基于证据的政策：对知识经纪的国际见解

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Numerous organisations act as 'evidence brokers', providing and translating research for use by decision-makers. The relationship between the supply and demand for evidence is far from linear, and whether these organisations are self-professed evidence brokers or government appointed bodies, they face similar challenges in their quest to impact policy. This paper analyses the strategies of two organisations considered 'exemplars' of institutional knowledge brokerage: the CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis and the Washington State Institute for Public Policy. The author posits that three primary factors help these organisations connect evidence successfully to policy-makers: the institution's credibility, based on independence, neutrality, reputation, trust, transparency and the quality of its methods and evidence; the utility of its research, based on transferability, timing, stakeholder involvement and resonance with policy-makers; and the communication of that research, in terms of effectiveness, dissemination, presentation and translation for policy-makers. Findings, and the possibility of applying these insights internationally, are then discussed and contextualised.

机译：许多组织充当“证据经纪人”，为决策者提供和翻译研究成果。证据供求之间的关系远非线性关系，无论这些组织是自称的证据经纪人还是政府任命的机构，它们在寻求影响政策方面都面临着类似的挑战。本文分析了两个被视为机构知识经纪“典范”的组织的战略：CPB荷兰经济政策分析局和华盛顿州公共政策研究所。作者认为，三个主要因素可以帮助这些组织成功地将证据与决策者联系起来：基于独立性，中立性，声誉，信任，透明度以及方法和证据质量的机构的信誉；基于可转让性，时机，利益相关者的参与以及与政策制定者的共鸣，其研究的实用性；以及在政策制定者的有效性，传播，介绍和翻译方面进行的研究交流。然后讨论发现和在国际上应用这些见解的可能性。

著录项

来源
《Contemporary social science》 |2015年第2期|114-125|共12页
作者
Ashley Thomas Lenihan;
展开▼
作者单位

London School of Economics, Centre for International Studies, London, UK,Institute for Law, Science, & Global Security, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
evidence; evidence-based policy; impact; knowledge mobilisation; knowledge broker; policy; research utilisation;

机译：证据;循证政策;影响;知识动员;知识经纪人;政策;研究利用;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Knowledge Brokerage at the Science-Policy Interface: New perspectives on tools for policy appraisal [J] . Lyytimaki Jari, Soderman Tarja, Turnpenny John Environmental science & policy . 2015,第Null期

机译：科学与政策互动中的知识经纪：政策评估工具的新观点
2. Evidence-based policy: exploring international and interdisciplinary insights [J] . Linda Hantrais, Ashley Thomas Lenihan, Susanne MacGregor Contemporary social science . 2015,第2期

机译：循证政策：探索国际和跨学科的见解
3. International and interdisciplinary insights into evidence-based policy [J] . Contemporary social science . 2014,第4期

机译：对基于证据的政策的国际和跨学科见解
4. Topics on Knowledge Management: An Empirical Insight into Articles Published in the International Journal of Knowledge Management [C] . Brockmann Carsten, Roztocki Narcyz Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences . 2015

机译：知识管理主题：对《国际知识管理杂志》上发表的文章的实证研究
5. Internationalization Alive: International Student Experiences, Higher Education Policy and the Imagination of Brazil in the Global Knowledge Economy [D] . Bindi de Oliveira, Frederico Menino. 2018

机译：活着的国际化：国际学生经历，高等教育政策和巴西在全球知识经济中的想象力
6. Investigation of Physicians’ Attitudes Concerning the Implementation of International Classification Systems of Diseases as a Precondition for Evidence-based Policy Making [O] . Vasiliki Tsikna, Olga Siskou, Petros Galanis, 2013

机译：作为实施循证决策的前提条件的医师对实施国际疾病分类系统的态度的调查
7. Home > All Content > Vol 50, No 1 (2019) Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development Cover Page Edited by: James Georgalakis and Pauline Rose June 2019 Volume 50 Issue 1 This issue aims to identify how partnerships focused on the production of policy-engaged research seek to achieve societal impact and explores the challenges in these processes. The collaborations analysed span academia, civil society and government, from the grassroots to the national and global levels. By locating these examples within the broader debates on interactions between researchers and research users designed to strengthen evidence informed decision making, this publication offers concepts and practices to inform those funding, designing and undertaking development research. The featured case studies are explored through the perspectives of both researchers and their partners in civil society and policy. They are predominantly taken from a diverse portfolio of research projects funded through the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Department for International Development (DFID) Strategic Partnership. A collaboration with the Impact Initiative, this IDS Bulletin is essential reading for all those in research organisations, development agencies and donors committed to the better use of evidence and learning for development. Exploring Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.100 ABSTRACT FULL ISSUE PDF Foreword Diana Dalton DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.102 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Introduction: Identifying the Qualities of Research–Policy Partnerships in International Development – A New Analytical Framework James Georgalakis, Pauline Rose DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.103 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Rethinking Research Impact through Principles for Fair and Equitable Partnerships Kate Newman, Sowmyaa Bharadwaj, Jude Fransman DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.104 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Pathways to Impact: Insights from Research Partnerships in Uganda and India Rachel Hinton, Rona Bronwin, Laura Savage DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.105 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Exploring Partnerships between Academia and Disabled Persons’ Organisations: Lessons Learned from Collaborative Research in Africa Maria Kett, Mark T. Carew, John-Bosco Asiimwe, Richard Bwalya, Anderson Gitonga, Boakai A. Nyehn, Joyce Olenja, Leslie Swartz, Nora Groce DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.106 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Layered and Linking Research Partnerships: Learning from YOUR World Research in Ethiopia and Nepal Vicky Johnson, Anannia Admassu, Andrew Church, Jill Healey, Sujeeta Mathema DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.107 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Fundamental Challenges in Academic–Government Partnership in Conflict Research in the Pastoral Lowlands of Ethiopia Mercy Fekadu Mulugeta, Fana Gebresenbet, Yonas Tariku, Ekal Nettir DOI: 10.19088/1968-2019.108 ABSTRACT PDFONLINE ARTICLE Regional Research–Policy Partnerships for Health Equity and Inclusive Development: Reflections on Opportunities and Challenges from a Southern African Perspective [O] . Nicola Yeates, Themba Moeti, Mubita Luwabelwa 2019

机译：主页>所有内容> Vol 50，第1号（2019年）探索国际发展顾客的研究 - 政策伙伴关系：詹姆斯格拉巴拉斯和波雷琳上升2019年6月50卷第1卷这个问题旨在确定合作伙伴关系如何关注政策的生产。 - 繁殖的研究寻求实现社会影响并探索这些过程中的挑战。合作分析了跨度学术界，民间社会和政府，从基层到国家和全球层面。通过在研究人员和研究用户之间的相互作用的更广泛辩论中找到这些示例，旨在加强证据明智的决策，本出版物提供了通知这些资金，设计和开发研究的概念和实践。通过研究人员及其合作伙伴在民间社会和政策的角度来看，探讨了特色案例研究。它们主要从英国经济和社会研究委员会（ESRC）和国际发展部（DFID）战略伙伴部资助的各种研究项目组合中获取。与影响计划的合作，此IDS公告是研究组织，发展机构和捐助者致力于更好地利用证据和学习发展的所有人的重要阅读。探索研究 - 在国际发展中的研究 - 政策伙伴关系James Georgalakis，Pauline Rose Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.100 Abstract完整发行PDF前言戴安娜DALTON DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.102抽象PDFONLINE文章简介：确定国际发展中研究政策伙伴关系的质量 - 新的分析框架詹姆斯·乔治拉斯·罗琳·罗拉克斯：10.19088 / 1968-2019.103抽象Pdfonline文章通过公平和公平合作伙伴关系的原则重新思考研究影响凯特纽曼，Sowmyaa Bharadwaj，Jude Fransman Do：10.19088 / 1968-2019.104抽象Pdfonline文章途径影响：来自乌干达和印度Rachel Hinton，RONA Bronwin，Laura Bronwin的研究伙伴关系的见解：10.19088 / 1968-2019.105抽象的PDFonline文章探讨了学术界和残疾人士组织之间的伙伴关系：从非洲玛丽亚凯特的合作研究中吸取的经验教训。克鲁，约翰 - 博斯科阿斯蒂姆韦，理查德Bwalya，安德rson gitonga，Boakai A. Nyehn，Joyce Olenja，Leslie Swartz，Nora Groce Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.106 Abstract Pdfonline文章分层和链接研究合作伙伴关系：从您的世界研究中学习在埃塞俄比亚和尼泊尔Vicky Johnson，Anannia Admassu，安德鲁教堂的世界研究， JILL HEALELY，SUJETA MATHEMA DOI：10.19088 / 1968-2019.107抽象PDFONLINE文章在学术界政府伙伴关系中的基本挑战在冲突研究中埃塞俄比亚牧场的牧区牧场地区牧羊犬MULUGETA，宇瓦·塔利克（Ekal Nettir Doi：10.19088 / 1968-2019.108摘要PDFONLINE文章区域研究 - 健康股权和包容性发展的政策伙伴关系：关于南部非洲观点的机遇和挑战的思考

Institutionalising evidence-based policy: international insights into knowledge brokerage

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅