...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cybernetics & Human Knowing >Aristotle and George Spencer-Brown
【24h】

Aristotle and George Spencer-Brown

机译：亚里斯多德和乔治·斯宾塞·布朗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The paper deals with Aristotelian logic as the special case of more general epistemology and sociology of both science and common sense. The Aristotelian principles of identity, of noncontradiction, and of excluded middle are to be supplemented by the second-order cybernetic, or cybernEthic principles of paradox, of ambivalence, and of control. In this paper we collect some ideas on how to evaluate the scope of Aristotelian logic with respect to the laws of thought they tried to determine and to do so within the historical moment of the impact of the invention of writing possibly triggering this determination. We look at some modern doubts concerning these laws and discovering an understanding of complexity that is not to be resumed under any principle of identity. The invention of sociology, epistemology, and the mathematics of communication follow suit in focusing not only on the observer but more importantly on the distinction between observers to further contextualize any talk of identities and operationalize both talk and fact of contradiction, paradox, and ambivalence.
机译：本文将亚里斯多德逻辑作为科学和常识性的更一般的认识论和社会学的特例。亚里士多德的身份，无矛盾和被排除在中间的原则应由二阶控制论或矛盾的，矛盾性和控制性的网络伦理原则加以补充。在本文中，我们收集了一些关于如何根据他们试图确定的思想定律来评估亚里士多德逻辑范围的想法，并在可能触发该确定的发明发明的历史性时刻这样做。我们研究了有关这些定律的一些现代疑问，并发现了对复杂性的理解，这种理解不能在任何身份原则下恢复。社会学，认识论和通信数学的发明不但着眼于观察者，而且更重要的是着眼于观察者之间的区别，以进一步使任何身份对话变得语境化，并使对话，事实，矛盾，悖论和矛盾情绪化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号