首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Military autonomy: its origins, limits, and the politico-military dialectic of war
【24h】

Military autonomy: its origins, limits, and the politico-military dialectic of war

机译:军事自治:战争的起源,局限性和政治-军事辩证法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Military officers often oppose political interference in the conduct of war. Political leaders respond by citing Clausewitz's contention that "war is the continuation of politics with the addition of other means." Scholarship in security studies and civil-military relations argues that civilians are right to oppose military autonomy because it serves the parochial interests of the military. However, through the dialectical relationship between the violent essence of war and its political nature, Clausewitz provides an alternative explanation for military demands for autonomy. He shows that military and political leaders are prone to an incomplete understanding of war that can undermine strategy and policy.
机译:军官经常反对政治干预战争。政治领导人以克劳塞维茨(Clausewitz)的论点回应说,“战争是政治的继续,是通过其他手段的补充。”安全研究和军民关系方面的奖学金认为,反对军事自主权是正确的,因为它符合人民的狭och利益。军队。但是,通过战争的暴力本质与其政治性质之间的辩证关系,克劳塞维茨为军事上对自治的要求提供了另一种解释。他表明,军事和政治领导人容易对战争产生不完整的了解,这会破坏战略和政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号