首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Military autonomy: its origins, limits, and the politico-military dialectic of war
【24h】

Military autonomy: its origins, limits, and the politico-military dialectic of war

机译:军事自主权:其起源,限制和政治战争的战争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Military officers often oppose political interference in the conduct of war. Political leaders respond by citing Clausewitz's contention that "war is the continuation of politics with the addition of other means." Scholarship in security studies and civil-military relations argues that civilians are right to oppose military autonomy because it serves the parochial interests of the military. However, through the dialectical relationship between the violent essence of war and its political nature, Clausewitz provides an alternative explanation for military demands for autonomy. He shows that military and political leaders are prone to an incomplete understanding of war that can undermine strategy and policy.
机译:军官经常反对战争行为的政治干扰。政治领导人通过引用Clasewitz的争论来回应“战争是通过添加其他方式的政治的延续。”安全研究和民事政策的奖学金认为,平民是反对军事自治的权利,因为它是军队的狭隘利益。然而,通过战争的暴力本质与其政治性质之间的辩证关系,ClaseWitz为军事要求提供了对自主的替代解释。他表明,军事和政治领导人倾向于不完全对战争和政策的战争的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号