首页> 外文期刊>Defence Studies >Arguing about alliances: the art of agreement in military-pact negotiations
【24h】

Arguing about alliances: the art of agreement in military-pact negotiations

机译:争论联盟:军事协定谈判协议艺术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Why do states agree (or fail to agree) alliance treaties? Arguing about Alliances is a smart re-imagining of a central problem in international relations (IR) - the origin of alliances. Paul Poast situates his work alongside Stephen Walt's (1987) Origins of Alliances and Glenn Snyder's (1997) Alliance Politics - "rather than knocking Walt or Snyder off the shelf, this book should (hopefully) sit between them (Poast 2019, 3)." Arguing about Alliances is not only an important theoretical and empirical contribution to the alliance and broader IR literature; it is also an example of how to conduct and communicate exhaustive, multi-method social science research. Poast's central findings are that war plan compatibility is the key driver of alliance agreement, and that when war plan compatibility is low, the attractiveness of participants' outside options becomes critical. He conveys these findings thoroughly and convincingly.
机译:为什么国家同意(或未能同意)联盟条约?争论联盟是一个聪明的重新想象国际关系中的核心问题(IR) - 联盟的起源。 Paul Poast与Stephen Walt(1987)的起源和Glenn Snyder(1997)联盟政治的起源发生 - “而不是敲开沃尔特或斯奈德,这本书应该(希望)坐在他们之间(Poast 2019,3)。 “争论联盟不仅是对联盟和更广泛的IR文献的重要理论和实证贡献;这也是如何进行和沟通详尽,多方法社会科学研究的例子。 Poast的中央发现是战争计划兼容性是联盟协议的关键驱动力,而战计划兼容性低,参与者外部选择的吸引力变得至关重要。他彻底和令人信服地传达了这些调查结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Defence Studies》 |2020年第2期|182-184|共3页
  • 作者

    Jordan Becker;

  • 作者单位

    United States Army Institue for European Studies (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) CERI/Sciences Po (Paris) IRSEM (Paris);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号