• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Assessment of radiographers’ competences from the perspectives of radiographers and radiologists: a cross-sectional survey in Lithuania
【24h】

Assessment of radiographers’ competences from the perspectives of radiographers and radiologists: a cross-sectional survey in Lithuania

机译：从放射线技师和放射线医师的角度评估放射线技师的能力：立陶宛的横断面调查

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Assessing radiographers’ clinical competence is of major importance in all medical imaging departments, and is a fundamental prerequisite for guaranteeing professional standards in both nursing care and radiography. Despite the fact that self-assessment has been reported to be the most common form of competence evaluation only several studies defining the radiographers’ self-assessment of clinical competencies were identified. The aim of the study was to evaluate radiographers’ professional competence from the perspectives of radiographers and radiologists by applying the Radiographers’ Competence Scale (RCS). Methods The study was conducted in university hospitals of Lithuania. We used the original instrument designed by Swedish researchers – the Radiographers’ Competence Scale (RCS) consisting of two domains: A “Nurse-initiated care” and B “Technical and radiographic processes”. The study involved in all 397 respondents; radiographers (250) and radiologists (147) working in departments of diagnostic radiology. Each competence was evaluated twice – the level on a 10-point scale, and the frequency of practical application on a 6-point scale. Results The overall level of the radiographers’ competence and the frequency of its use in practice were evaluated high or very high by both respondent groups. The radiographers attributed the highest evaluations to such competences as “Encouraging and supporting the patient” and “Collaborating with other radiographers”, while the lowest evaluations were attributed to “Guiding the patient’s relatives” and “Empowering the patient by involving him/her in the examination and treatment” competences. The radiologists attributed the highest evaluations to such competences as “Collaborating with radiologists” and “Independent carrying out of the radiologist’s prescriptions”, while the lowest evaluations – to the same competences as the radiographers did. Irrespectively of the work experience and age, the radiographers gave significantly higher ratings to all competences that the radiologists did ( p Conclusions Both groups of the respondents attributed high or very high evaluations to the competences in both the “Nurse-initiated care” and the “Technical and radiographic processes” domains.
机译：背景技术评估放射线照相师的临床能力在所有医学影像部门中至关重要，并且是保证护理和放射线照相专业水平的基本前提。尽管据报道自我评估是能力评估的最常见形式，但只有几项研究定义了放射线照相师对临床能力的自我评估。该研究的目的是通过应用放射线师的能力量表（RCS）从放射线师和放射线医师的角度评估放射线师的专业能力。方法该研究在立陶宛的大学医院进行。我们使用了瑞典研究人员设计的原始仪器–放射线师的能力量表（RCS），该量表包括两个领域：“护士发起的护理”和“技术和射线照相过程”。该研究涉及所有397名受访者。在放射诊断学部门工作的放射线照相师（250）和放射线医师（147）。每个能力都进行了两次评估-10分等级的水平，以及6分等级的实际应用频率。结果两组受访者对放射线照相师的总体水平及其在实践中使用的频率的评价都很高或很高。放射技师对“鼓励和支持患者”和“与其他放射技师合作”等能力的评价最高，而对放射技师的评价最低的归因于“指导患者的亲戚”和“让患者参与其中以增强能力”。检查和治疗”的能力。放射科医生将最高评价归功于“与放射科医生合作”和“独立执行放射科医生的处方”等能力，而最低评价则归因于与放射技师相同的能力。不论工作经验和年龄如何，放射线照相师对放射线医生所做的所有能力的评价都很高（p结论结论两组受访者均对“护士启动的护理”和“放射线护理”中的能力给予了很高或非常高的评价。技术和射线照相过程”领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号