• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Conference presentation to publication: a retrospective study evaluating quality of abstracts and journal articles in medical education research
【24h】

Conference presentation to publication: a retrospective study evaluating quality of abstracts and journal articles in medical education research

机译：会议发表论文：一项回顾性研究，评估医学教育研究中摘要和期刊文章的质量

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There is little evidence regarding the comparative quality of abstracts and articles in medical education research. The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), which was developed to evaluate the quality of reporting in medical education, has strong validity evidence for content, internal structure, and relationships to other variables. We used the MERSQI to compare the quality of reporting for conference abstracts, journal abstracts, and published articles. This is a retrospective study of all 46 medical education research abstracts submitted to the Society of General Internal Medicine 2009 Annual Meeting that were subsequently published in a peer-reviewed journal. We compared MERSQI scores of the abstracts with scores for their corresponding published journal abstracts and articles. Comparisons were performed using the signed rank test. Overall MERSQI scores increased significantly for published articles compared with conference abstracts (11.33 vs 9.67; P?
机译：关于医学教育研究中摘要和文章的相对质量的证据很少。旨在评估医学教育报告质量的医学教育研究质量研究工具（MERSQI）在内容，内部结构以及与其他变量之间的关系方面拥有强大的有效性证据。我们使用MERSQI比较了会议摘要，期刊摘要和已发表文章的报告质量。这是对提交给普通内科医师学会2009年年会的全部46项医学教育研究摘要的回顾性研究，这些摘要随后发表在同行评审的期刊上。我们将摘要的MERSQI分数与相应的已发表期刊摘要和文章的分数进行了比较。使用带符号秩检验进行比较。与会议摘要（11.33 vs 9.67; P 。001）和期刊摘要（11.33 vs 9.96; P 。001）相比，已发表文章的总体MERSQI分数显着提高。关于MERSQI量表，在抽样领域（1.59 vs 1.34; P？= ?. 006），数据分析（3.00 vs 2.43; P？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号