• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pediatrics >Social inclusion for children with hearing loss in listening and spoken Language early intervention: an exploratory study
【24h】

Social inclusion for children with hearing loss in listening and spoken Language early intervention: an exploratory study

机译：听力和口语早期听力障碍儿童的社会融合：一项探索性研究

获取原文
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Social inclusion is a common focus of listening and spoken language (LSL) early intervention for children with hearing loss. This exploratory study compared the social inclusion of young children with hearing loss educated using a listening and spoken language approach with population data. Methods A framework for understanding the scope of social inclusion is presented in the Background. This framework guided the use of a shortened, modified version of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) to measure two of the five facets of social inclusion (‘education’ and ‘interacting with society and fulfilling social goals’). The survey was completed by parents of children with hearing loss aged 4–5 years who were educated using a LSL approach ( n =?78; 37% who responded). These responses were compared to those obtained for typical hearing children in the LSAC dataset ( n =?3265). Results Analyses revealed that most children with hearing loss had comparable outcomes to those with typical hearing on the ‘education’ and ‘interacting with society and fulfilling social roles’ facets of social inclusion. Conclusions These exploratory findings are positive and warrant further investigation across all five facets of the framework to identify which factors influence social inclusion.
机译：背景技术社会融合是听力损失儿童早期听和说语言（LSL）早期干预的共同重点。这项探索性研究比较了使用听和说语言方法教育的听力受损儿童的社会包容性与人口数据。方法在背景技术中提出了一个理解社会包容范围的框架。该框架指导了对澳大利亚儿童纵向研究（LSAC）的简化版的使用，以衡量社会包容的五个方面（“教育”和“与社会互动并实现社会目标”）中的两个。这项调查是由4-5岁的听力障碍儿童的父母完成的，他们接受了LSL方法的教育（n =？78;有37％的回答）。将这些响应与在LSAC数据集中为典型听力儿童获得的响应进行比较（n =？3265）。结果分析显示，大多数听力受损的孩子在“教育”，“与社会互动和履行社会角色”方面的社会包容性方面，与典型听力障碍的孩子相比具有可比性。结论这些探索性发现是积极的，需要对框架的所有五个方面进行进一步调查，以确定哪些因素影响社会包容性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号