首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology >Comparison of Serological Assays for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Antibodies in Different Groups of Obstetrical and Gynecological Patients
【24h】

Comparison of Serological Assays for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Antibodies in Different Groups of Obstetrical and Gynecological Patients

机译:血清学检测沙眼衣原体抗体在不同妇产科人群中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

New serological enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were compared with microimmunofluorescence (MIF) as a “gold standard” to detect Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies in different groups of obstetrical, gynecological, and subfertile patients. There were no significant differences in seroprevalence rates, except for the group of C. trachomatis-positive patients (P < 0.01). Test characteristics were calculated for Chlamydia-EIA (Biologische Analysensystem GmbH, Lich, Germany) and pELISA (Medac, Wedel, Germany). pELISA seems to be a good alternative to MIF. It has high specificity and is easier to perform.
机译:将新的血清酶免疫测定(EIA)与微免疫荧光(MIF)作为“金标准”进行比较,以检测产科,妇科和亚生育力不同患者组中的沙眼衣原体抗体。除 C组外,血清流行率没有显着差异。沙眼阳性患者( P <0.01)。计算衣原体-EIA(Biologische Analysensystem GmbH,Lich,德国)和pELISA(Medac,Wedel,德国)的测试特性。 pELISA似乎可以替代MIF。它具有很高的特异性并且更易于执行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号